Dijelovi osvrta novinara Josipa Mlakića objavljenog u hrvatskog magazinu "Ekspres" na članak Timothyja Lessa objavljenog u prestižnom američkom magazinu "Foreign Affairs" (cijeli članak ispod teksta)
Najspornija teza iz teksta je ona o nužnosti prekrajanja granica na Balkanu tako da se stvore nacionalne države, odnosno velika Srbija, Hrvatska i Albanija, i to prvenstveno na račun Bosne i Hercegovine. Republika Srpska bi po tom scenariju bila pripojena Srbiji, a uspostavljeni "treći entitet", hrvatski, bio bi pripojen Republici Hrvatskoj. Drugi veliki gubitnik prema Lessovu scenariju bila bi Makedonija, čiji bi dijelovi, uz Kosovo, bili pripojeni Albaniji.
Nakon tog procesa ostala bi Bosna kao neovisna država koja bi bila bazirana na prostor Sarajeva i ostale dijelove. Moguće je da bi se Srebrenica i dijelovi RS-a s bošnjačkom većinom mogli pridružiti bosanskoj državi. Srbi i Bošnjaci bi trebali o tome raspravljati.
Lessova analiza se ne smije tek tako odbaciti, njena najveća snaga je u tome što polazi od neodrživosti trenutnog stanja u Bo
sni i Hercegovini, do kojeg je dovela pogrešna politika Zapada.
Očajničke karte jedne potrošene politike, kao što je kontaminiranje društva sumnjivim novcem iz nedemokratskih arapskih režima koji završava u džepovima nekolicine, dodatno kompliciraju problem budućnosti BiH... Političke elite u BiH, a pogotovo bošnjačka, moraju shvatiti jedno: dosadašnja politika unitarizma je jedna krajnost, a ideje o pripojenju nekih dijelova BiH Hrvatskoj, odnosno Srbiji, druga.
Odavno ponavljam kako je ključni problem BiH Izetbegovićev SDA, koji je cijelu zemlju pretvorio u taoce pohlepe svojih odabranih članova. Nedavno je na Federalnoj televiziji emitiran prilog iz Zvornika, gdje je bošnjačka sirotinja za 50 maraka prodala svoj glas na prošlim lokalnim izborima Dodikovu SNSD-u. Je li itko na trenutak u sarajevskoj centrali, ..., pomislio na ljudsko dostojanstvo tog svijeta?
Extracts of the analysis of the journalist Josip Mlakic published in the Croatian weekly "Express" of the article of Timothy Less published in the prestigious US magazine "Foreign Affairs" (a full original text of the article below)
The most disputable thesis of the (Less's) article is on the necessity of re-drawing the borders in the Balkans with the aim to establish nation-states, i.e. Greater Serbia, Croatia and Albania, predominantly at the expense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. According to this scenario, Republika Srpska would become a part of Serbia and a newly established Croatian "Third Entity" would be annexed to the Republic of Croatia. The second big loser, according to the Less's scenario would be Macedonia, the parts of which, along with Kosovo, would be annexed to Albania.
Following this process, Bosnia concentrated to the area of Sarajevo and the other parts would remain an independent state. It is also possible that Srebrenica and parts of Republika Srpska with a Bosniak majority could become parts of such Bosnian state. Serbs and Bosniaks should discuss these options.
Less's analysis should not be rejected just like that, as its greatest power derives from the unsustainability of the present situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina as a result of the wrong politics of the West.
Desperate cards of drawn out politics, such as contamination of society with suspicious money from undemocratic Arab regimes ending up in the pockets of only few, further complicate the issue of BiH future... Political elites in BiH, particularly Bosniak, must comprehend one thing: the current politics of unitarism is one extreme, and the idea of annexation of some parts of BiH to Croatia and Serbia - another.
I have been stressing out for a while that a key problem in BiH is Izetbegovic's SDA, which turned the entire country into the hostage of its chosen members' greed. Only recently the Federation TV broadcast about Zvornik, where during the last local elections, the Bosniak poor had sold their vote for 50 KM to Dodik's SNSD. Was anybody at Sarajevo HQ only for a moment ... thinking of human dignity of these people?
Najspornija teza iz teksta je ona o nužnosti prekrajanja granica na Balkanu tako da se stvore nacionalne države, odnosno velika Srbija, Hrvatska i Albanija, i to prvenstveno na račun Bosne i Hercegovine. Republika Srpska bi po tom scenariju bila pripojena Srbiji, a uspostavljeni "treći entitet", hrvatski, bio bi pripojen Republici Hrvatskoj. Drugi veliki gubitnik prema Lessovu scenariju bila bi Makedonija, čiji bi dijelovi, uz Kosovo, bili pripojeni Albaniji.
Nakon tog procesa ostala bi Bosna kao neovisna država koja bi bila bazirana na prostor Sarajeva i ostale dijelove. Moguće je da bi se Srebrenica i dijelovi RS-a s bošnjačkom većinom mogli pridružiti bosanskoj državi. Srbi i Bošnjaci bi trebali o tome raspravljati.
Lessova analiza se ne smije tek tako odbaciti, njena najveća snaga je u tome što polazi od neodrživosti trenutnog stanja u Bo
sni i Hercegovini, do kojeg je dovela pogrešna politika Zapada.
Očajničke karte jedne potrošene politike, kao što je kontaminiranje društva sumnjivim novcem iz nedemokratskih arapskih režima koji završava u džepovima nekolicine, dodatno kompliciraju problem budućnosti BiH... Političke elite u BiH, a pogotovo bošnjačka, moraju shvatiti jedno: dosadašnja politika unitarizma je jedna krajnost, a ideje o pripojenju nekih dijelova BiH Hrvatskoj, odnosno Srbiji, druga.
Odavno ponavljam kako je ključni problem BiH Izetbegovićev SDA, koji je cijelu zemlju pretvorio u taoce pohlepe svojih odabranih članova. Nedavno je na Federalnoj televiziji emitiran prilog iz Zvornika, gdje je bošnjačka sirotinja za 50 maraka prodala svoj glas na prošlim lokalnim izborima Dodikovu SNSD-u. Je li itko na trenutak u sarajevskoj centrali, ..., pomislio na ljudsko dostojanstvo tog svijeta?
Extracts of the analysis of the journalist Josip Mlakic published in the Croatian weekly "Express" of the article of Timothy Less published in the prestigious US magazine "Foreign Affairs" (a full original text of the article below)
The most disputable thesis of the (Less's) article is on the necessity of re-drawing the borders in the Balkans with the aim to establish nation-states, i.e. Greater Serbia, Croatia and Albania, predominantly at the expense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. According to this scenario, Republika Srpska would become a part of Serbia and a newly established Croatian "Third Entity" would be annexed to the Republic of Croatia. The second big loser, according to the Less's scenario would be Macedonia, the parts of which, along with Kosovo, would be annexed to Albania.
Following this process, Bosnia concentrated to the area of Sarajevo and the other parts would remain an independent state. It is also possible that Srebrenica and parts of Republika Srpska with a Bosniak majority could become parts of such Bosnian state. Serbs and Bosniaks should discuss these options.
Less's analysis should not be rejected just like that, as its greatest power derives from the unsustainability of the present situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina as a result of the wrong politics of the West.
Desperate cards of drawn out politics, such as contamination of society with suspicious money from undemocratic Arab regimes ending up in the pockets of only few, further complicate the issue of BiH future... Political elites in BiH, particularly Bosniak, must comprehend one thing: the current politics of unitarism is one extreme, and the idea of annexation of some parts of BiH to Croatia and Serbia - another.
I have been stressing out for a while that a key problem in BiH is Izetbegovic's SDA, which turned the entire country into the hostage of its chosen members' greed. Only recently the Federation TV broadcast about Zvornik, where during the last local elections, the Bosniak poor had sold their vote for 50 KM to Dodik's SNSD. Was anybody at Sarajevo HQ only for a moment ... thinking of human dignity of these people?
Nema komentara:
Objavi komentar