Prikazani su postovi s oznakom Oružje i vojska/ Arms and military. Prikaži sve postove
Prikazani su postovi s oznakom Oružje i vojska/ Arms and military. Prikaži sve postove

utorak, 6. listopada 2020.

Minister Osmić Visited Glamoč and Military Polygon “Barbara” (Sarajevo Times, MARCH 23, 2013)

 https://www.sarajevotimes.com/minister-osmic-visited-glamoc-and-military-polygon-barbara/?fbclid=IwAR2ED7Ybj1S5_nMJSb1CGcwY_Zb-OgW3F5Vg2MgUwUPEvT8tSTnQQy-hEMo

The BiH Minister of Defense Zekerijah Osmić and the Chief of the Joint Staff of the BIH Armed Forces (OSBiH) General Major Anto Jeleč visited Glamoč and the military polygon “Barbara” yesterday.

They were informed in the barracks about the project obligations for applying different models of resolutions for ammunition and mining-explosive surplus, and the accompanying effects on locations in the Armed Forces.

After the briefing in the polygon there was a demonstration on how to destroy ammunition in a special furnace.

Osmić visited the mayor of municipality Glamoč Radovan Marković with Generals Anto Jeleč and Mirko Tepšić.

During the meeting, an agreement was reached that the experts should confirm what are the effects of destroying ammunition and other explosives at the polygon “Barbara” on the environment, and after expert analysis appropriate eco-measures will be taken, announced the Office for Public Relations of the BiH Ministry of Defense.


četvrtak, 10. rujna 2020.

Legacies of the Troubles: The Links between Organized Crime and Terrorism in Northern Ireland - abstract, notes and citations by John Jupp and Matthew Garrod (04 Nov 2019)

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1678878 (full article available for purchase from the link) Abstract One of the most important legacies of the “Troubles” in Northern Ireland and the ensuing 20 years post-peace-process era, heralded by the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, is the rise of complex and diverse Republican and Loyalist paramilitary groups engaging in acts of terrorism and a wide range of organized criminal and cross-border activities. Yet, little scholarship has been dedicated for examining the nexus between terrorism and organized crime in Northern Ireland or for accurately understanding the role that paramilitaries play in organized crime and their dynamic interactions with organized criminal groups. Informed by empirical evidence and qualitative interviews with government agencies in Northern Ireland, it is this important gap in scholarship that this article aims to fill. It does so by developing a new terrorism-organized crime model which reveals a range of different types of crime-terror interactions in Northern Ireland. The article concludes that national terrorism-organized crime models, and the Northern Ireland model in particular, albeit with variations to its constituent components to accommodate local situations, are most appropriate for capturing intricate and dynamic interactions between these two phenomena across diverse environments rather than existing models designed for universal application. Additional information Notes 1 The Troubles refers to a violent thirty-year armed conflict in Northern Ireland involving on one side terrorist paramilitary groups fighting for the unification of Ireland (Republican) and on the other side those fighting for Northern Ireland to remain part of the United Kingdom (Loyalist). 2 Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of Ireland, 10 April 1998. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-belfast-agreement (accessed 6 March 2019). 3 Interview. See also House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, The Financing of Terrorism in Northern Ireland, Fourth Report of Session 2001-02, HC 978-1 (2002), paras. 3–4; Independent Monitoring Commission, Third Report of the Independent Monitoring Commission (HC 1218, London, The Stationery Office, November 4, 2004), paras. 5, 13. 4 Home Office, Proscribed Terrorist Organizations, 1 March 2019. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/783067/proscribed-terrorist-organizations.pdf (accessed 6 March 2019). 5 Interview. According to government agencies within Northern Ireland, the designation of these fourteen groups as terrorist organizations is due to historical and political reasons. Legally, some remain designated as terrorist organizations but politically they are not treated as terrorist organizations as they have decommissioned and are committed to the peace process. However, these organizations are essentially the same in their organizational structure, modi operandi, and capacity to commit terrorist violence as many of the other paramilitary groups that have not been designated as terrorist organizations. In the present article, terrorist and paramilitary groups are used interchangeably. 6 Peter Neumann, Old and New Terrorism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009); Bruce Hoffmann, “Rethinking Terrorism and Counterterrorism Since 9/11,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 25, no. 5 (2002): 303–16. doi:10.1080/105761002901223; Paul Wilkinson, “International Terrorism: The Changing Threat and the EU’s Response” (Chaillot Paper No. 84, Institute for Security Studies, European Union, Paris, October 2005). 7 Rohan Gunaratna and Aviv Oreg, “Al Qaeda’s Organizational Structure and its Evolution,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 33, no. 12 (2010): 1043–78, doi:10.1080/1057610X.2010.523860; Johnathon Stevenson, “Al-Qaeda’s Evolution Since 9/11,” Strategic Comments 23, no. 8 (2017): vii–viii, doi:10.1080/13567888.2017.1385982 8 Interview. 9 The military defeat of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (Da’esh) in 2017 has forced the group to evolve and transform from a hierarchically organized group, concentrating on conquering and holding territory, to a covert, networked group with a flat hierarchy and cells and affiliates increasingly acting autonomously. Despite many Islamic State fighters and commanders being killed, members of the group have fled to neighboring States seeking refuge, while 20,000–30,000 members are hiding out in sympathetic communities in Iraq and Syria. Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) members have established themselves in Libya, Algeria, and Morocco, as well as Asia, including Bangladesh and the Philippines. It is therefore likely that an Islamic State group core will survive for the foreseeable future. Letter dated 17 January 2018 from the Chair of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011), and 2253 (2015) concerning Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (Da’esh), Al-Qaida and associated individuals, groups, undertakings and entities addressed to the President of the Security Council, U.N. Doc. S/2018/14/Rev.1, February 27, 2018; Letter dated 16 July 2018 from the Chair of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999), 1989 (2011) and 2253 (2015) concerning Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (Da’esh), Al-Qaida and associated individuals, groups, undertakings and entities addressed to the President of the Security Council, U.N. Doc. S/2018/705, July 27, 2018; Phill Hynes, “As ISIS Winds Down In Syria and Iraq, a New Hotbed of Terror Is Created—In Asia,” Frontera, 2 August 2016. 10 Until its military defeat, Da’esh had an Islamist caliphate in the heart of the Middle East and exerted control over an estimated 90,000 square kilometers of territory and a taxable population of seven to eight million people, as well as oilfields and refineries, vast grain stores, lucrative smuggling routes, and vast stockpiles of arms and ammunition, making it the strongest, best resourced, and most ideologically potent terrorist quasi-State of the post–11 September 2001 era. At the same time, Da’esh was transnational in nature by attracting tens of thousands of foreign fighters from over 100 countries and creating the necessary infrastructure to carry out significant external terrorist attacks. Jason Burke, “Rise and Fall of Isis: Its Dream of a Caliphate is Over, so What Now?,” The Guardian, 21 October 2017. 11 The UVF, UDA, and INLA are reported to still be recruiting new members. Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland, “An Assessment Commissioned by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the Structure, Role and Purpose of Paramilitary Groups Focusing on those which Declared Ceasefires in Order to Support and Facilitate the Political Process,” 19 October 2015, para. 2. House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, The Financing of Terrorism in Northern Ireland, Fourth Report of Session 2001-02, HC 978-1 (2002), para. 68. 12 Since the signing of the Good Friday Agreement in 1998, the Republican paramilitary dominance of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) has been replaced by the violent dissident Republicans violent dissident Republicans, a set of groups whose aim is to maintain the paramilitary conflict in the pursuit of a united Ireland. They reject the legitimacy of the peace process and believe that Sinn Fein and the PIRA have sold out the Republican community through their engagement in the politics of normalization. See John Horgan and John Morrison, “Here to Stay? The Rising Threat of Violent Dissident Republicanism in Northern Ireland,” Terrorism and Political Violence 23, no. 4 (2011), 642–69. doi:10.1080/09546553.2011.594924. 13 PSNI Statistics Branch, “Police Recorded Security Situation Statistics 1 September 2017 to 31 August 2018,” 7 September 2018. See also Lord Alderdice, John McBurney, and Monica McWilliams, “The Fresh Start Panel Report on the Disbandment of Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland” (Northern Ireland Executive, 7 June 2016), para. 2.7; Rachel Monaghan and Peter Shirlow, “Forward to the Past? Loyalist Paramilitarism in Northern Ireland Since 1994,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34, no. 8 (2011), pp. 649–65. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2011.583205; John Morrison and John Horgan, “Reloading the Armalite? Victims and Targets of Violent Dissident Irish Republicanism 2007–2015,” Terrorism and Political Violence 28, no. 3 (2016), pp. 576–97. doi:10.1080/09546553.2016.1155940. According to “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland, An Assessment Commissioned by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the Structure, Role and Purpose of Paramilitary Groups,” para. 2, there were between fifteen and forty attacks annually between 2000 to 2015 inclusive primarily directed at PSNI officers. 14 Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth, Hansard Parliamentary Debates, Official Report, 18 July 2017, 1590. 15 Northern Ireland Terrorism Legislation: Annual Statistics 2016/17, Northern Ireland Office, 7 November 2017, 7–12; Northern Ireland Terrorism Legislation: Annual Statistics 2017/18, Northern Ireland Office, 7 November 2018, 7–12. 16 Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament, Annual Report 2016–2017, HC 655 (December 2017), 27. 17 Alex P. Schmid, “Revisiting the Relationship between International Terrorism and Transnational Organised Crime 22 Years Later” (Research Paper, The International Center for Counter-Terrorism, The Hague (2018): 1–40, doi:10.19165/2018.1.06 18 Ben Saul, “Terrorism as a Legal Concept,” in Routledge Handbook of Law and Terrorism, ed. Genevieve Lennon and Clive Walker (London, Routledge, 2015), 19–38. 19 Neil Boister, “The UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime 2000,” in International Law and Transnational Organized Crime, ed. Pierre Hauck and Sven Peterke (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016), 126–49. 20 Department of Justice, “Organised Crime Task Force Annual Report and Threat Assessment 2017–18: Organised Crime in Northern Ireland” (2018). https://www.justice-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/justice/octf-2017-18-annual-report.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019), 6. See also Department of Justice, “The Northern Ireland Organised Crime Strategy” (Organized Crime Task Force) (2016). https://www.octf.gov.uk/OCTF/media/OCTF/documents/publications/N.I.%20Organised%20Crime%20Strategy/The-NI-Organized-Crime-Strategy-April-2016.pdf?ext=.pdf (accessed 7 March 2019). The definition in Northern Ireland is slightly different to that provided by the United Kingdom’s National Crime Agency: “Organized crime can be defined as serious crime planned, coordinated and conducted by people working together on a continuing basis. Their motivation is often, but not always, financial gain. Organized criminals working together for a particular criminal activity or activities are called an organized crime group.” National Crime Agency, “Organized Crime Groups.” http://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/crime-threats/organized-crime-groups (accessed 7 March 2019). 21 The definition of terrorism is contained in section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000. The current definition refers to the use or threat of action involving serious violence against a person, serious damage to property, the endangerment of a person’s life, the creation of a serious risk to the health and safety of the public or a section of the public, or serious interference with or seriously disrupting an electronic system where the use of threat is designed to influence the government or an international governmental organization or to intimidate the public or a section of it. See further R v Gul (Appellant) [2013] UKSC 64. 22 See, for example, Erik Alda and Joseph L Sala, “Links Between Terrorism, Organized Crime and Crime: The Case of the Sahel Region,” Stability: International Journal of Security & Development 3, no. 1 (2014): 1–9. doi:10.5334/sta.ea; Rajan Basra, Peter R. Neumann, and Claudia Brunner, “Criminal Pasts, Terrorist Futures: European Jihadists and the New Crime-Terror Nexus” (London: International Center for the Study of Radicalization and Political Violence, 2016); Sergei Boeke, “Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb: Terrorism, Insurgency, or Organized Crime?,” Small Wars & Insurgencies 27, no. 5 (2016): 914–36. doi:10.1080/09592318.2016.1208280; Chris Dishman, “The Leaderless Nexus: When Crime and Terror Converge,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 28, no. 3 (2005): 237–52. doi:10.1080/10576100590928124; Michael Fredholm, Transnational Organized Crime and Jihadist Terrorism: Russian-Speaking Networks in Western Europe (New York: Routledge, 2017); Annette Hübschle, “From Theory to Practice: Exploring the Organized Crime-Terror Nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Perspectives on Terrorism 5, no. 3–4 (2011): 81–95; Leslie Holmes, ed., Terrorism, Organized Crime and Corruption: Networks and Linkages (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007); Tamara Makarenko, “The Crime-Terror Nexus: Do Threat Perceptions Align with Reality?,” in Defining and Defying Organized Crime: Discourse, Perceptions and Reality, ed. Felicia Allum, Francesca Lono, Daniela Irrera, and Panos A Kostakos (London, Routledge, 2010), 180–92; Tamara Makarenko and Michael Mesquita, “Categorising the Crime–Terror Nexus in the European Union,” Global Crime 15, no. 3–4 (2014): 259–74. doi:10.1080/17440572.2014.931227; John T Picarelli, “Osama bin Corleone? Vito the Jackal? Framing Threat Convergence Through an Examination of Transnational Organized Crime and International Terrorism,” Terrorism and Political Violence 24, no. 2 (2012): 180–98. doi:10.1080/09546553.2011.648349; Tuesday Reitano, Colin Clarke, and Laura Adal, “Examining the Nexus between Organized Crime and Terrorism and its Implications for EU Programming” (Counter-Terrorism Monitoring, Reporting and Support Mechanism, European Union, 2017); James Windle, John Morrison, Aaron Winter, and Andrew Silke, eds., Historical Perspectives on Organized Crime and Terrorism (London: Routledge, 2017). 23 For example, Phil Williams, “Terrorism and Organized Crime: Convergence, Nexus or Transformation?” in FOA Report on Terrorism, ed. Gunnar Jervas (Swedish Defense Research Establishment (1998), 69–92; Tamara Makarenko, “The Crime-Terror Continuum: Tracing the Interplay between Transnational Organized Crime and Terrorism Global Crime 6, no. 1 (2004), 129–45; Louise I. Shelley et al., “Methods and Motives: Exploring Links between Transnational Organized Crime & International Terrorism,” US Department of Justice (2005); Steven Hutchinson and Pat O’Malley, “A Crime–Terror Nexus? Thinking on Some of the Links between Terrorism and Criminality,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 30, no. 12 (2007): 1095–1107; Santiago Ballina, “The Crime-Terror Continuum Revisited: A Model for the Study of Hybrid Criminal Organizations,” Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism 6, no. 2 (2011): 121–36; Tamara Makarenko, “Europe's Crime-Terror Nexus: Links between Terrorist and Organized Crime Groups in the European Union,” Directorate General for Internal Policies—Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs (2012); Marinko Bobic, “Transnational Organized Crime and Terrorism: Nexus Needing a Human Security Framework” Global Crime 15, no. 3–4 (2014), 241–58. 24 For example, John F. Morrison, “Origins and Rise of Dissident Irish Republicanism: The Role and Impact of Organizational Splits” (New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2014); John F. Morrison, “Fighting Talk: The Statements of the IRA/New IRA,” Terrorism and Political Violence 28, no. 3 (2016a), pp. 598–619; John F. Morrison and John Horgan, “Reloading the Armalite? Victims and Targets of Violent Dissident Irish Republicanism 2007–2015,” Terrorism and Political Violence 28, no. 3 (2016); John F. Morrison, “Copying to be Different: Violent Dissident Irish Republican Learning,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 40, no. 7 (2017), pp. 586–602. 25 To date, a number of studies have noted links between organized crime and terrorist financing in Northern Ireland. For example, Andrew Silke, “In Defense of the Realm: Financing Loyalist Terrorism in Northern Ireland—Part One: Extortion and Blackmail,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 21, no. 4 (1998): 331–61; John Horgan and Max Taylor, “Playing the Green Card—Financing the Provisional IRA: Part 1, Terrorism and Political Violence 11, no. 2 (1999), pp. 1–38; Andrew Silke, “Drink, Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll: Financing Loyalist Terrorism in Northern Ireland— Part Two, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 23, no. 2 (2000), pp. 107–27; Richard Evans, “Organized Crime and Terrorism Financing in Northern Ireland,” Intelligence Review 14, no. 9 (2002), pp. 26–29; John Horgan and Max Taylor, “Playing the Green Card—Financing the Provisional IRA: Part 2,” Terrorism and Political Violence 15, no. 2 (2003), pp. 1–60; Jon Moran, “Paramilitaries, ‘Ordinary Decent Criminals’ and the Development of Organized Crime Following the Belfast Agreement,” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 32 (2004), pp. 263–278; Ryan Clarke and Stuart Lee, “The PIRA, D-Company, and the Crime-Terror Nexus,” Terrorism and Political Violence 20, no. 3 (2008): 376–95; Niahm Hourigan, John Morrison, James Windle, and Andrew Silke, “Crime in Ireland North and South: Feuding Gangs and Profiteering Paramilitaries,” Trends in Organized Crime 21, no. 2 (2018), pp. 126–46; Peng Wang, “The Crime-Terror Nexus: Transformation, Allegiance, Convergence,” Asian Social Science 6, no. 6 (2010): 11–20, at 15. doi:10.5539/ass.v6n6p11 26 In 2005 the Independent Monitoring Commision reported that “because of […] paramilitary involvement, organized crime is the biggest long-term threat to the rule of law in Northern Ireland.” 27 Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South,” 137. 28 Interview. House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, The Financing of Terrorism in Northern Ireland, Fourth Report of Session 2001-02, HC 978-1 (2002), para. 32. 29 Interview. 30 The identities of these experts remain anonymous for security reasons. We refer to them in generic terms as “government experts” to protect their anonymity as disclosure of their roles in their organizations may reveal their identity. It is important to note, at the outset, that the nature and extent of the crime–terror nexus does not always correlate with criminal prosecutions, as this may not always be deemed the most efficient or effective means of disrupting criminal activity and there may also be issues of obtaining evidence to the requisite standard of proof and potentially revealing sensitive sources of intelligence; as such, the nexus also has to be established and mapped by intelligence gathered from investigations by various government agencies. Additionally, there are always issues of accuracy when relying on reports of newspapers, media accounts, and scholarship. In an effort to counterbalance this, we have had our findings verified and corroborated by government agencies. 31 Additionally, this article is informed by the present authors’ experience and insight in leading, in 2018, a project on the links between terrorism and crime from a global perspective on behalf of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 32 “The Hague Good Practices on the Nexus Between Transnational Organized Crime and Terrorism,” Global Counterterrorism Forum. https://www.thegctf.org/Portals/1/Documents/Framework%20Documents/C/GCTF-Good-Practices-on-the-Nexus_ENG.pdf?ver=2018-09-21-122246-363 (accessed 6 March 2019), 4. 33 “Concept Note, Open Briefing of the Counter-Terrorism Committee on the Nexus between International Terrorism and Transnational Organized Crime,” Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED), 8 October 2018, 2. 34 It also has to be borne in mind that, in applying the Northern Ireland model to other jurisdictions, states define the concepts of “organized crime” and “terrorism” differently, often in radically different ways, and sometimes not at all. 35 HM Government, “Local to Global: Reducing the Risk from Organized Crime,” (2011), para. 44. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97823/organized-crime-strategy.pdf (accessed 6 March 2019). 36 Home Office, “Future Directions for Organized Crime Research” (2011). ://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/116653/future-organized-crime-res-2011.pdf (accessed 6 March 2019). 37 S/RES/2195, 19 December 2014. See also Report of the Secretary-General on the threat of terrorists benefiting from transnational organized crime, UN Doc. S/2015/366, 21 May 2015. 38 UNICRI and Thailand Institute of Justice, “Breaking the Organized Crime and Counter-Terrorism Nexus: Identifying Programmatic Approaches,” Meeting Report (2016). 39 UNODC, “Countering Illicit Arms Trafficking and its Links to Terrorism and Other Serious Crime” (2017). Stepping Up International Efforts to Address the Nexus between terrorism and transnational crime: What More Can be Done? Organized by the Government of the Netherlands, Interpol and the UNODC Terrorism Prevention Branch (2017). https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND_CCPCJ_joint/Side_Events/2017/17-02842_CCPCJ_program_ebook.pdf. United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI) and Thailand Institute of Justice (2016), “Breaking the Organized Crime and Counter-Terrorism Nexus: Identifying Programmatic Approaches,” Meeting Report. http://unicri.it/in_focus/files/NEXUS_REPORT_UNICRI.pdf. 40 Tamara Makarenko, “Europe's Crime-Terror Nexus: Links between Terrorist and Organized Crime Groups in the European Union,” Directorate General for Internal Policies—Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs (2012); Tamara Makarenko, “Address to the European Parliament’s Special Committee on Organized Crime, Corruption and Money Laundering“ (2013). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201302/20130221ATT61506/20130221ATT61506EN.pdf; Reitano et al., “Examining the Nexus.” See also European Police Office (Europol), “Changes in Modus Operandi of Islamic State (IS) Revisited” (The Hague: Europol, 2016); European Police Force, “European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report” (The Hague: Europol, 2017). Interpol, “INTERPOL Launches Project to Counter Terrorism in South and Southeast Asia,” 30 August 2017, https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2017/N2017-110. 41 Council of Europe, 2nd Conference on Terrorism and Organized Crime, September 2017. https://www.coe.int/en/web/counter-terrorism/terrorism-and-organized-crime-2017, 21–22. 42 The UNICRI initiative resulted in the development of The Hague Good Practices on the Nexus between Transnational Organized Crime and Terrorism, endorsed at the Ninth Global Counter-Terrorism Forum Ministerial Plenary Meeting in New York in September 2018. See “The Hague Good Practices.” 43 7351st mtg., 19 December 2014. 44 The Fresh Start Panel Report on the Disbandment of Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland (2016), paras. 2.7–2.23. https://www.northernireland.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/newnigov/The%20Fresh%20Start%20Panel%20report%20on%20the%20disbandment%20of%20paramilitary%20groups.pdf (accessed 6 March 2019). 45 Ibid. 46 A Fresh Start. The Stormont Agreement and Implementation Plan (2015). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/479116/A_Fresh_Start_-_The_Stormont_Agreement_and_Implementation_Plan_-_Final_Version_20_Nov_2015_for_PDF.pdf (accessed 6 March 2019). 47 Fresh Start Panel Report. 48 See also “Organized Crime Task Force, 2017–18 Annual Report and Threat Assessment, Organized Crime in Northern Ireland,” Appendix 2 (2018). 49 The Task Force was established in September 2017 as part of the commitment to tackle paramilitary activity in Northern Ireland set out in the Fresh Start Agreement. It was to include forty PSNI officers, twenty-two NCA personnel, and ten customs officers and to receive £25million over five years; see Vincent Kearney, “New Taskforce to Tackle Paramilitaries,” BBC, 27 September 2017. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-41407322; interview. 50 Interview. 51 Fresh Start Panel Report, 11. 52 The term “Brexit” refers to Britain’s decision to exit from the European Union following a referendum held on 23 June 2016. See Mark Daly, Pat Dolan, and Mark Brennan, “Northern Ireland Returning to Violence as a Result of a Hard Border due to Brexit or a Rushed Border Poll: Risks to Youth,” UNESCO, February 2019. https://senatormarkdaly.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/unesco-chairs-report-brexit-return-to-violence.pdf (accessed 6 March 2019). See also Police Remuneration Review Body, “Fourth Report on Northern Ireland 2018” (25 May 2018), 7–9. 53 We do not include corruption in this model due to a lack of empirical evidence but note that in jurisdictions impacted by the nexus between terrorism and organized crime in Northern Ireland corruption may be an additional component of interaction. 54 It is important to note that these constituent elements are not necessarily self-contained and there may in some cases be overlap between activity assimilation and alliances. 55 Home Office, “List of Proscribed Terrorist Groups or Organizations.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/proscribed-terror-groups-or-organizations–2 (accessed 7 March 2019), 21. 56 Paramilitary groups in Northern Ireland, An Assessment Commissioned by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the Structure, Role and Purpose of Paramilitary Groups Focusing on Those which Declared Ceasefires in Order to Support and Facilitate the Political Process, 19 October 2015, para. 2; Fresh Start Panel report, para. 2.7. For example, NIRA are alleged to have been responsible for the bomb attack in Derry on 19 January 2019. See Rory Carroll, “Derry Bomb Attack: Northern Ireland Police Arrest Four Men,” Guardian 20 January 2019. 57 Williams, “Terrorism and Organized Crime,” 70; Makarenko, “The Crime–Terror Continuum,” 131; Makarenko, “Categorising,” 260; Shelley et al., “Methods and Motives,” 37. Williams and Shelley et al. refer to this type of linkage as a “nexus.” 58 Chris Dishman, “Terrorism, Crime and Transformation,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 24, no. 1 (2001): 43–58; see also Peng Wang, “The Crime-Terror Nexus,” 15. 59 Europol, “EU Drug Markets Report. In-Depth Analysis,” 2016. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/2373/TD0216072ENN.PDF (accessed 7 March 2019), 18. 60 House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, “The Financing of Terrorism in Northern Ireland,” Fourth Report of Session 2001-02, HC 978-1 (2002), para. 22. 61 The need for expanding tactical expertise led the PIRA, and other republican groups, to seek direct training from international allies to complement their own internal training. In the 1970s it is widely believed that both the Irish National Liberation Army (INLA) and the PIRA received training in Palestine from the Palestine Liberation Organization. See John F. Morrison and Paul Gill, “100 Years of Irish Republican Violence,” Terrorism and Political Violence 28, no. 3 (2016), pp. 409, 411; Morrison, “Copying to be Different,” 589. 62 These three men—Niall Connolly, Martin McCauley, and James Monaghan—indicted in Columbia in 2002 for training FARC militants in the use of explosives, including homemade mortars, and, in 2004, were sentenced to seventeen years in prison. It is important to keep in mind that this is not the first time that FARC and PIRA have allegedly exchanged knowledge and information. PIRA purportedly initiated contact with FARC in 1997 through the Euskadi Ta Askatasuna, with which PIRA has a long-standing relationship and has exchanged knowledge and technical know-how, particularly in bomb making. According to an April 2002 U.S. Department of State report, one of the three PIRA men, Connolly, Sinn Fein’s representative in Cuba, initiated the contact with FARC in 1997; and, from 1998 to 2001, at least fifteen PIRA militants traveled to Colombia, along with Iranian, Cuban, and Basque terrorists, to train FARC. One expert alleged that senior PIRA leaders would have sanctioned this kind of an exchange of technology with another militant group, even though they are publicly adhering to a cease-fire. Notably, PIRA has a long-standing policy prohibiting “freelancing” by its members; as such, the Colombia Three did not likely act alone, despite vehement denials from Sinn Fein, which does not want to be seen as violating the cease-fire. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, responding to the information that this relationship developed after the 1997 peace process began in Northern Ireland, said on a trip to Bogotá in December 2002 that the groups were “sharing experiences and knowledge.” For a case study examining the exchange of technology and knowledge between the PIRA and the FARC, see Kim Cragin, Peter Chalk, Sara A. Daly, and Brian A. Jackson, “Sharing the Dragon's Teeth: Terrorist Groups and the Exchange of New Technologies” (Santa Monica, USA: RAND Corporation, 2007), ch. 5. See also House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, The Financing of Terrorism in Northern Ireland, Fourth Report of Session 2001-02, HC 978-1 (2002), para. 5; Hearing before the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, “International Global Terrorism. It’s Links with Illicit Drugs as Illustrated by the IRA and other Groups in Colombia” (April 2002). http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa78947.000/hfa78947_0f.htm (accessed 7 March 2019). 63 David Bamber, “The IRA ‘is Teaching Palestinians How to Blow Up Israeli Soldiers’ in West Bank,” The Telegraph 28 April 2002; Jim Cusack, “Taliban Using IRA Bomb Techniques in Terror War,” Irish Independent 3 June 2007. 64 Andrew Alderson, David Bamber, and Francis Elliott, “IRA’s Involvement in International Terrorism,” The Daily Telegraph 28 April 2002. 65 Shelley et al., “Methods and Motives,” 36. 66 Dishman, “Terrorism,” 48–49. 67 Williams, “Terrorism and Organized Crime,” 70. 68 Shelley et al., “Methods and Motives,” 53 69 Makarenko and Mesquita, “Categorising,” 260. 70 The importance of conflicts that occur between terrorist groups and organized criminal groups has recently been highlighted by Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South.” 71 Shelley et al., “Methods and Motives,” 54; Makarenko and Mesquita, “Categorising,” 260. 72 Ibid. 73 We are concerned with this relationship in this analysis rather than the additional possibility of organized criminal groups adopting terrorist tactics as we find no evidence of this development in Northern Ireland. This is not to adopt Shelley et al.’s definition of a hybrid, which normally envisaged a convergence of separate terrorist and organized crime groups. 74 Interview. 75 Interview. See also House of Commons Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs, Third Report, 28 June 2006, paras. 11–12. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmniaf/886/88605.htm#n44; House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, The Financing of Terrorism in Northern Ireland, para. 18. 76 For debates on the dichotomy, see, for example, Alison Jamieson, “The Use of Terrorism and Organized Crime,” in Root Causes of Terrorism. Proceedings from an International Expert Meeting, ed. Tore Bjørgo, Conference Report, The Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (Oslo, 9–11 June 2003), 169. See also Louise I. Shelley, Dirty Entanglements: Corruption, Crime and Terrorism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 113. 77 Dishman, “Terrorism,” 47-50. 78 Williams, “Terrorism and Organized Crime,” 71. 79 Shelley et al., “Methods and Motives,” 36. 80 Makarenko, “The Crime–Terror Continuum,” 135; Makarenko and Mesquita, “Categorising,” 261. 81 Rosie Cowan, “Loyalists Recruit the Next Generation,” The Guardian, 2 April 2001. 82 Paramilitary groups in Northern Ireland, An Assessment Commissioned by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the Structure, Role and Purpose of Paramilitary Groups Focusing on Those which Declared Ceasefires in Order to Support and Facilitate the Political Process. 83 Ibid., para. 18. Interview. 84 Ibid., para. 2. 85 Ibid. 86 IMC, First Report 20 April 2004, 25. 87 “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland,” para. 2. 88 For example, Makarenko and Mesquita, “Categorising,” 261. 89 See earlier, referenced in the introductory text. 90 For example, Clarke and Lee observed that “the continuum proposed by Makarenko cannot sufficiently account for the blurred distinction between categories of criminal or terrorist, nor can it realistically represent the dynamic complexity of the PIRA’s former day-to-day operations as a terror group, punishment squad, criminal group for fundraising, and alleged collaborator with both state and non-state actors.” Clarke and Lee, “The PIRA, D-Company, and the Crime-Terror Nexus,” 392. 91 For example, see Schmid, “Revisiting the Relationship between International Terrorism and Transnational Organised Crime 22 Years Later,” 13. 92 For example see Wang, “The Crime-Terror Nexus.” 93 Dishman noted different degrees of transformation from one type of group—terrorist or criminal—to another but not those outlined in this article. 94 Although the model is Northern Ireland–focused, it does take into account terrorist groups located in Northern Ireland that engage in organized crime and have interactions with organized criminal groups transnationally. 95 Silke, “In Defense of the Realm,” 335–336; HC Committee Northern Ireland Affairs. Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, Financing of Terrorism, Fourth Report, 2001–02. 96 One report estimated the combined budget for UDA and the UVF to be £3 million per annum: see Darwin Templeton, “Terror Bosses Feel the Pinch,” Sunday Life, 21 April 1996, 12; the PIRA’s annual budget was in the region of £15 million: see Silke, “In Defense of the Realm,” 333. In 2002 the PSNI estimated that PIRA raised £5–8 million annually, while RIRA raised £5 million, UDA raised £1 million, and UVF raised £1.5 million: see House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, “The Financing of Terrorism in Northern Ireland, Fourth Report of Session 2001–02,” HC 978-1 (2002), para. 33. 97 Interview. See also Silke, “Drink, Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll”; House of Commons, “The Financing of Terrorism,” paras. 11–12. 98 Interview. House of Commons, “The Financing of Terrorism,” para. 13. 99 Interview. 100 Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South.” 101 Ibid., 142. 102 House of Commons, “The Financing of Terrorism”; Organized Crime Task Force, “The Threat Assessment 2002: Serious and Organized Crime in Northern Ireland.” (Belfast: Northern Ireland Office, 2002). 103 Ibid. 104 Interview. Terrorist–organized crime alliances are frequently referred to by intelligence and law enforcement officials across Europe as a “marriage of convenience.” See Makarenko, “Europe’s Crime-Terror Nexus.” 105 Dishman, “Terrorism”; Silke, “In Defense of the Realm”; Evans, “Organized Crime and Terrorism Financing in Northern Ireland”; Chris Ryder, “Organized Crime and Racketeering in Northern Ireland,” in Combatting Terrorism in Northern Ireland, ed. James Dingley (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009). 106 Interview. James Bone and Tom Farmery, “Italian Police Arrest 20 People in €450 Million IRA Money Laundering Plot,” The Times, 6 March 2013. 107 Makarenko, “Europe’s Crime-Terror Nexus,” 23–24. 108 European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction, “EU Drug Markets Report: In-Depth Analysis” (EMCDDA–Europol Joint Publications, Luxembourg, 2016), 33. 109 Italian investigators ultimately were unable to identify the source of the money. 110 Leandro Di Natala, “Anti-Money Laundering Operation Proves Links between Italian ‘Ndrangheta and IRA” (European Strategic Intelligence and Security Center, 2013). http://www.esisc.org/contact-us. 111 See also Main & Ors v (Giambrone & Law) & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1193. 112 Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South,” 138; Clarke and Lee, “The PIRA, D-Company, and the Crime-Terror Nexus.” 113 Fitzsimons was extradited to Italy in 2013, having fled to Senegal, but was eventually released due to insufficient evidence, Mark Rainey, “Ex-IRA Man Henry ‘Harry’ Fitzsimons Beats Mafia Fraud Extradition,” News Letter, 30 April 2016. 114 Interview. 115 Interview. 116 Interview. Tom Clonan, “This Dublin Gun Violence Bears all the Hallmarks of Paramilitary Involvement,” The Guardian, 10 February 2016; Paul Williams, “Deadly Kinahan-Hutch Feud is Linked to €7.6 m Tiger Kidnaping,” Irish Independent, 28 January 2018; Henry McDonald, “Dublin’s Dead Men Walking: 29 on Death List in Brutal Gangland War,” The Guardian, 19 February 2018. 117 Interview. The Hutch gang controls smuggling routes at Dublin port. The Kinahan cartel have always craved control of that network and by defeating the Hutch gang they would take over these routes, 118 James Quinn was convicted for the murder of Gary Hutch in Spain. Reportedly, Hutch was murdered following an attempt by the Hutch group to murder Daniel Kinahan—the son of the Kinahan organized crime group. Gerard Couzens, “James Quinn Jailed for 22 Years in Spain over Gary Hutch Murder,” The Irish Times, 21 June 2018. 119 Interview. In 2008 several police forces across Europe collaborated to investigate the Kinahan crime group. The investigation, codenamed “Operation Shovel,” was led by Spanish authorities but also incorporated specialist police teams in Belgium, the Republic of Ireland, and the United Kingdom. UN Office on Drugs and Crime, “Operation Shovel,” https://www.unodc.org/cld/case-law-doc/drugcrimetype/esp/operation_shovel.html (accessed 4 March 2019). 120 Interview. See also Ewan MacKenna, “Boxing to Daniel Kinahan is What Football was to Pablo Escobar—and It’s Choking the Sport in Ireland,” Irish Independent, 5 March 2018. 121 Vincent Kearney, “Dublin Weigh-In Murder: Continuity IRA Claims Murder of David Byrne,” BBC News, 8 February 2016. 122 According to one source, the weapons used to murder Byrne were obtained from an old PIRA stockpile. Allison Morris, “Suspect in Dublin Gangland Murder Dies,” The Irish News, 11 August 2017. 123 Interview. See also Conor Lally, “Kinahan-Hutch Feud Edges into Northern Ireland: North Increasingly used as Hiding Place for Criminals Involved in Gang Feud,” The Irish Times, 24 July 2017. 124 Paul Holtom, Paul James, and Connor Patmore, “From the IRA to ISIS: Exploring Terrorist Access to the UK’s Illicit Firearms Market,” in Triggering Terror: Illicit Gun Markets and Firearms Acquisition of Terrorist Networks in Europe, ed. Nils Duquet (Brussels: Flemish Peace Institute, 2018). The authors have observed the lacuna in academic research on terrorist acquisition of firearms in the United Kingdom. But see Michael Jonsson and Elliot Brennan, “Drugs, Guns and Rebellion: A Comparative Analysis of the Arms Procurement of Insurgent Groups in Colombia and Myanmar,” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 20, no. 3 (2014): 307–21. doi:10.1007/s10610-013-9228-0. 125 Interview. See also Holtom et al., “From the IRA to ISIS,” 409–417; Ciaran Barnes, “Murdered Dissident Republican Michael Barr got Mum to Stash his Haul of Drugs,” Belfast Telegraph, 3 May 2016. 126 Makarenko, “Europe’s Crime-Terror Nexus,” 23. 127 Jana Arsovska, “Introduction: Illicit Firearms Market in Europe and Beyond,” European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research 20, Iss. 3 (2014): 295–305, at 299–300. doi:10.1007/s10610-014-9254-6; Jana Arsovska and Panos Kostakos, “Illicit Arms Trafficking and the Limits of Rational Choice Theory: The Case of the Balkans,” Trends in Organized Crime 11, Iss. 4 (2008): 352–87. doi:10.1007/s12117-008-9052-y; Samantha Bricknell, “Firearm Trafficking and Serious and Organized Crime Gangs” (Research and Public Policy Series No. 116, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 2012). 128 After thirteen years of hiding, Karadzic was convicted in 2016 by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia for the commission of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity during the Bosnian war in the 1990s. PROSECUTOR v RADOVAN KARADŽIĆ, Case No.: IT-95-5/18-T, 24 March 2016. 129 Giles Tremlett, “Karadzic Family ‘Arming Real IRA,’” The Guardian, 5 April 2001. 130 The reason for Andabak’s questioning was in connection with the murder of a Bosnia Croat official who was blown up by an under-car booby-trap similar to those devised by the PIRA during the Troubles in the 1970s and 1980s. 131 Arsovska, “Introduction: Illicit Firearms,” 299–300; Henry McDonald, “Croat General ‘Armed Real IRA Terrorists,’” The Guardian, 24 September 2000. 132 Ibid. 133 Tremlett, “Karadzic.” 134 Interview. 135 Arsovska, “Introduction: Illicit Firearms,” 297–98. 136 Police Service of Northern Ireland, Police Recorded Security Situation Statistics Annual Report, 1 April 2016–31 March 2017, 17 May 17 2017, 2, 6. However, during 2017–18 the police recorded fifty shooting incidents, eleven fewer than in the previous year: Police Service of Northern Ireland, Police Recorded Security Situation Statistics Annual Report, 1 April 2017–31 March 2018. 137 Ibid. A significant level of terrorist threat remains in Northern Ireland as a result of the security situation, which is evidenced by the number of bombing incidents over the past five years; indeed, during the reporting period 2012–13 to 2016–17, there were 230 bombing incidents. Ibid., 5. In 2017–18, there were eighteen bombing incidents as a result of the security situation, the lowest number per year since 1995–96. 138 Ibid. This compares to sixty-six seized during the previous year. The number of firearms seized each year has fluctuated over the last decade with a peak of 176 firearms seized in 2011/12. 139 Ibid. 140 Ibid. However, during the reporting period 2017–18, PSNI officers seized forty firearms and 5,758 rounds of ammunition, the smallest number found since records began in 1969. Likewise, the 0.43 kg of explosives found during 2017–18 was the smallest quantity found since records began. Police Recorded Security Situation Statistics Annual Report, 1 April 2017–31 March 2018, 17 May 2018, 8. 141 Northern Ireland Terrorism Legislation Annual Statistics 2017/18, Northern Ireland Office, 7 November 2018, 12. 142 Interview. 143 Holtom, “From the IRA to ISIS,” 409–17. 144 Ibid. While automatic firearms are not considered an easily available option for a jihadist in the United Kingdom, the authors observe that “10 terrorist attacks foiled by British security services and police during 2015-16 involved plans to buy guns.” Ibid., 409. 145 Ibid., 410–13. 146 Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland, An Assessment Commissioned by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the Structure, Role and Purpose of Paramilitary Groups Focusing on Those which Declared Ceasefires in Order to Support and Facilitate the Political Process, 19 October 2015. 147 Holtom, “From the IRA to ISIS,” 411. 148 Ibid., 412–13; interview. 149 Ibid. 150 Interview. See also Bimpre Archer, “Three Quarters of Organized Crime Gangs in Belfast Involved in Drugs, Police Chief Reveals,” The Irish News, 5 March 2019. 151 Interview. See also John Cassidy, “UVF Link to Triad Gang: RUC Probe Attacks on Chinese Immigrants,” Sunday Mirror, 2 July 2000. 152 Ciaran Barnes, “UDA Drugs Ring Exposed—Terror Group’s Racket Involved Triad Gang and Ex-Mercenary,” 29 July 2018. See also BBC News, “‘Triad Gang Link’ to Belfast £1 m Cannabis Haul,” 10 January 2019. 153 Ibid. 154 Interview. 155 House of Commons Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs, Third Report, paras. 40–43. 156 Financial Action Task Force Report, “Illicit Tobacco Trade” (June 2012), 32. 157 Organized Crime Task Force, “The Northern Ireland Organized Crime Strategy” (April 2016), 4; Organized Crime Task Force, “Annual Report and Threat Assessment Organized Crime in Northern Ireland” (2017). 158 House of Commons Home Affairs Committee for the Tobacco Smuggling Inquiry, Written Evidence from Border Force, HM Revenue and Customs and the National Crime Agency, 6 May 2014. See also House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, Tobacco Smuggling, First Report of Session 2014–15, HC 200, 14 June 2014. 159 Interview. 160 Interview. 161 Interview. 162 Interview. 163 Hayley Halpin, “€4.5 Million Worth of Cigarettes Found at Dublin Port in Container Marked ‘Tyres,’” TheJournal.ie, 25 October 2017. 164 “Russia Gangs ‘Help Cigarette Scams,’” Belfast Telegraph, 22 June 2011. 165 Itai Zehorai, “The Richest Terror Organizations in the World,” Forbes International, 24 January 2018. 166 Laura K. Donohue, The Cost of Counterterrorism: Power, Politics and Liberty (Cambridge University Press, 2008), 127; James Adams, The Financing of Terror: How the Groups that are Terrorizing the World Get the Money to Do It (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986); Silke, “In Defense of the Realm,” 336; Dishman, “Terrorism,” 48–49. 167 Moran, “Paramilitaries,” 268. According to Moran, organizations on the opposite sides of the political divide will cooperate with each other in the allocation of targets situated on the boundaries of the areas they control. 168 Silke, “In Defense of the Realm,” 336-355. 169 Helen Shaw, “Mawhinney ‘Declares War’ on Paramilitary Rackets,” Irish Times 21 August 1987. 170 Phelim McAleer, “UVF Threat Delivered as Minister was Due,” Irish News, 10 November 1994. 171 “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland,” 19 October 2015. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/469548/Paramilitary_Groups_in_Northern_Ireland_-_20_Oct_2015.pdf (accessed 1 March 2019). 172 IMC, First Report 20 April 2004, 30. 173 Moran, “Paramilitaries,” 267. 174 “Report Highlights Level of Extortion in the North,” The Irish Times, 5 April 2006. 175 Alan O’Day, Terrorism’s Laboratory: The Case of Northern Ireland (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1995). 176 Jack Holland and Henry McDonald, I.N.L.A.: Deadly Divisions (Dublin: Torc, 1994), 26–27 and 73. 177 Moran, “Paramilitaries,” 266. 178 IMC, Fourth Report, 10 February 2005, 6. 179 Ibid., 5. 180 Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South,” 141. 181 Silke, “Drink, Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll,” 107–27. 182 Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South,” 141. 183 For example, see Organized Crime Task Force Annual Report and Threat Assessment (2016). https://www.octf.gov.uk/OCTF/files/12/12306e6f-0ad0-408a-b50d-558b2955932b.pdf (accessed 4 April 2019). 184 IMC, 26th Report, 4 July 2011, 56. 185 “Written Evidence from the Police Service of Northern Ireland,” Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmniaf/886/886we06.htm (accessed 28 February 2019). 186 See the section “Hybrids and Transformation.” 187 Interview. See also Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South,” 137–42. 188 IMC, 20th Report, 10 November 2008, 5; IMC, 21st Report, 7 May 2009, 9. 189 Ibid.; IMC, 25th Report, 4 November 2010, 17. 190 Stephen Wright, “IRA’s Cigarette-Smuggling Millionaires: Former Terrorists Flooding the UK with Potentially Lethal Fakes, Cheating Taxpayers of Billions,” Daily Mail 6 June 2013. 191 Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South,” 138. 192 Ciaran Barnes, “Thomas ‘Slab’ Murphy Takes a £10 Million Hit—Busted Armagh Plants ‘Linked to IRA Leader’s Gang,’” Belfast Telegraph, 29 February 2016. 193 House of Commons, “The Financing of Terrorism,” para. 5. 194 Ibid., paras. 68–81. 195 David Cracknell and Alan Murray, “Three Men Held in Slovakia over IRA Gunrunning,” The Telegraph, 8 July 2001. 196 Henry McDonald, “UK Accused of Failing Victims of IRA Killed by Libya-Supplied Weapons,” The Guardian, 2 May 2017. 197 Gordon Rayner, “Real IRA Commander Caught in MI5 Arms Dealing Sting,” The Telegraph, 30 June 2010. 198 Conor Spackman, “How an MI5 ‘Weapons Dealer’ Tricked a Real IRA Leader,” BBC, 2 July 2010. 199 Henry McDonald, “Men Arrested of Real IRA Links in Portugal,” The Guardian, 10 July 2011. 200 “Real IRA’s Michael Campbell Found Guilty after MI5 Sting,” BBC, 21 October 2011. In 2013 a Lithuanian Appeals Court overturned Campbell’s conviction due to lack of evidence. http://www.thejournal.ie/michael-campbell-released-1111352-Oct2013/ (accessed 7 March 2019). 201 Interview. 202 The Hutch–Kinahan conflict, discussed above, has no apparent geographical limitations and is taking place across Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, Spain, and beyond. The Garda operation to tackle the feud has resulted in the seizure of 456 firearms, €2.2 million cash, and illicit drugs valued at €64 million. However, despite the establishment of 22,428 check points across Dublin city in 2016 and 2017 to police the feud, efforts to stem the violence have had mixed success, partly because the leaders of the two feuding entities are based overseas. See also Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South.” 203 For discussion of the contract killing of David Byrne and the Kinahan criminal network, see the alliances section above. 204 Cormac O’Keeffe, “Kinahan Boss Issued with Threat to His Life,” Irish Examiner, 11 January 2017; Emma McMenamy, “Dissident Republicans Planning Massive Kinahan Retaliation Attack on Behalf of the Hutch Gang, Gardai Fear,” DublinLive, 12 January 2017. 205 Garreth MacNamee and Garreth MacNamee, “Gardai Probe ‘New IRA’ Group’s Bomb Trade with Hutch Gang,” TheJournal.ie, 8 June 2017. 206 Allison Morris, “Suspect in Dublin Gangland Murder Dies,” Irish News, 11 August 2017. 207 Lauren Fruen, “IRA ‘Revenge’. Now the IRA Declares War on Dublin Gangs: Security Forces on High Alert After Paramilitary Group ‘Sanctions Spectacular Revenge Attack’ for Shootings,” The Sun, 27 April 2016; Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, “Murder Hit Plots Unraveled in Irish Gang Wars,” 6 November 2018. 208 Emma McMenamy, “Fears New IRA Could Recruit Deadly Criminal Gangs from Europe to Assassinate Enemies,” Mirror, 29 April 2016. 209 Ryan had previously been convicted for possession of a firearm and receiving training in the use of firearms. “Six Given Jail for Taking Part in Real IRA Training Camp,” Drogheda Independent, 30 March 2001. 210 Cathal McMahon, “Promising GAA Player ‘The Beast’ Led Real IRA in a Bloody War on Drugs Gangs,” Indepebndent.ie, 7 December 2016; “The Truth About Alan Ryan and His Funeral,” Independent.ie, 16 September 2012. The “taxation” of criminal groups involved in the traffic and supply of drugs has been used by other Republican paramilitary groups in Northern Ireland, including the INLA and AAD, and terrorist organizations in other parts of the world. For example, in southern Colombia both the FARC guerrilla group and the paramilitary organizations fighting them imposed “taxes” on all the actors involved in the cocaine chain, including the cartels operating cocaine labs in the regions under their control. Likewise, in Afghanistan, the Taliban taxed the actors of the heroin chain, including the criminal organizations operating heroin laboratories. See Ryan Smith, “Revealed: The PSNI’s Four Main Targets in Organized Crime Crackdown,” BelfastLive, 12 January 2018; Vanda Felbab-Brown, Shooting Up: Counterinsurgency and the War on Drugs (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2010). 211 Interview. 212 “Missing Kinahan Hitman Stalked by New IRA Murder Squad,” Herald, 9 June 2016. 213 Ibid. 214 Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South,” 141; Ciaran Barnes, “Inside the UVF: Money, Murders and Mayhem—The Loyalist Gang’s Secrets Unveiled,” Belfast Telegraph, 13 October 2014. 215 Silke, “Drink, Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll.” 216 IMC, Sixth Report, September 2005, 4–6. 217 Hourigan et al., “Crime in Ireland North and South,” 141–42. 218 Ibid., 138. 219 “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland,” 2. 220 Interview. 221 IMC, 22nd Report, 4 November 2009, 19. 222 IMC, 24th Report, 15 September 2010, 3. 223 IMC, 1st Report, 20 April 2004, 16–17; and IMC 12th Report, 4 October 2006, 15–17. 224 IMC, 1st Report, 20 April 2004, 17. 225 IMC, 24th Report, 15 September 2010, 1–6. 226 “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland,” 2. 227 Interview. 228 “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland,” 2. 229 Interview. 230 Silke, “Drink, Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll.” 231 Peter Taylor, Loyalists (London: Bloomsbury, 2000). 232 Steve Bruce, The Red Hand. Protestant Paramilitaries in Northern Ireland (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992). 233 “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland,” 3. 234 IMC, 1st Report, 20 April 2004, 16–17, at 22. 235 IMC, 21st Report, 7 May 2009, 14. 236 IMC, 1st Report, 20 April 2004, 30; IMC, 21st Report, 13–14. 237 “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland,” 3. 238 Ibid., 4. 239 Dishman, “Terrorism,” 48–49. 240 IMC, 1st Report, 20 April 2004, 13. 241 The statement of 28 July 2005, stated, “volunteers must not engage in any other activities whatsoever.” See IMC, 7th Report, 19 October 2005, 9. 242 “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland,” 4. 243 “Report Highlights Level of Extortion in the North,” The Irish Times, 5 April 2006. 244 Interview. 245 IMC, 1st Report, 20 April 2004, 12. 246 IMC, 22nd Report, 4 November 2009, 19. 247 IMC, 20th Report, 10 November 2008, 9. 248 “Paramilitary Groups in Northern Ireland,” 1. 249 Ibid. 250 RIRA has been involved in drug dealing, kidnaping, robbery, extortion, and smuggling: see IMC, 21st Report, 7 May 2009, 11–12; ONH members have engaged in robbery, tobacco smuggling, and drug dealing: see IMC, 20th Report, 10 November 2008, 5; CIRA was noted as involved in serious criminal activities, including two armed robberies in 2009: see IMC, 21st Report, 9. 251 Both Loyalist and Republican groups have profited from transnational criminal operations, as outlined in Part II. See also Donohue, “The Cost of Counterterrorism.” Donohue notes that Republican arms have come from the Balkans and Loyalist paramilitaries have obtained weapons from South Africa (128). 252 Jeremy McDermott, “IRA Training Haunts Colombia’s Guerilla War,” The Telegraph, 3 August 2007. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1559348/IRA-training-haunts-Colombias-guerrilla-war.html (accessed 5 June 2019). Within the PIRA’s broader structure, there were numerous independent brigades, each of which were made up of an indeterminate number of active service units. The South Armagh Brigade had a particularly high level of independence and was really “under the control of local chieftains … rather than part of a structured centrally directed organization.” Brendan O'Brien, The Long War: The IRA and Sinn Féin (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1999). 253 In 2014 the Home Office Border Force, HMRC, and National Crime Agency highlighted that, in Northern Ireland, there is “clear evidence” that organized criminal groups with presumed loyalist and nationalist affiliations are prepared actively to trade contraband cigarettes with each other, with one group smuggling, and then selling to the other for onward distribution; “this further blurs any clear delineation of criminal activity according to particular factions/groups.” https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/home-affairs/Tobacco-written-evidence.pdf (accessed 3 June 2019). Also, interview 24 August 2018. 254 John Horgan and Max Taylor, “The Provisional Irish Republican Army: Command and Functional Structure,” Terrorism and Political Violence, 9, no. 3 (1997), pp. 1–32. 255 Interview. 256 See also https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/home-affairs/Tobacco-written-evidence.pdf 257 Interview. 258 Fresh Start Agreement. https://www.northernireland.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/nigov/a-fresh-start-stormont-agreement_0.pdf 259 Vincent Kearney, “Loyalist Paramilitary Groups ‘to Support Rule of Law,” BBC News, 9 April 2018 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-43698164 (accessed 11 June 2019). 260 Interview. 261 Moran, “Paramilitaries,” pp. 269–70. 262 UNICRI, “The Hague Good Practices.”

subota, 5. rujna 2020.

Vecernji List (5.9.2018) Last year Bosnia and Herzegovina exported arms and ammunition and military equipment valued 193 million BAM, which also ended up at the battlefields

In 2017 Bosnia and Herzegovina exported 5,9 million kilos of arms and ammunition and military equipment valued 193 million BAM. A part of it ended up in the warzones. The major export destinations were Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and the US, but BaH exported also to Egypt, Turkey, Serbia, Iraq, Congo, Germany, Bulgaria, Austria, Switzerland and Romania. While Republika Srpska exported only about 1 million worth of arms and ammunition, FBaH exported 192 million. The majority of companies in the Federation are concentrated on the holding Unis group (these companies are Igman Konjic, BNT Novi Travnik, Unis Ginex from Gorazde, Binas Bugojno, Pretis Vogosca, Vitezit from Vitez, Zrak from Sarajevo and Remontni zavod Hadzici). Most of these contracts are made through the US companies such as Army Contracting, Alliant Techsystems and Global Ordinance, but also through the company #Krupnik from #Belgrade which is used for the export to Saudi Arabia.

utorak, 25. kolovoza 2020.

Honouring of obligations and commitments by Croatia resumed debate, Mr Taylor (United Kingdom, 26 SEPTEMBER 2000 (PACE report)

http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/Records/2000/e/0004261000e.htm?fbclid=IwAR1hEjIGjK-XzbmrQb7lb2lTmL0bLvEGtUom5bysyDd_zbPcjz2zmwJV5tc#4
"The #ICTY has questioned General Ivan #Andabak over his alleged involvement in supplying the #RealIRA with weapons. In addition, the police are investigating the role of an Irish aid worker from County Louth who has longstanding connections to Catholic charities in Croatia and is thought to be involved in the arms-smuggling network. That was spelt out in detail in the Boston Globe last Friday. Again I ask the authorities in Croatia to have a closer look at some of the people in some of the NGOs. Some of them are clearly damaging the Belfast agreement in Ireland."
"Real IRA was responsible for the terrible bomb in Omagh when almost 30 people were killed. Recently, RPG rockets were fired in both Northern Ireland and London. The source of those armaments appears to be Croatia. I ask the Croatian authorities to do their utmost to ensure that the flow of armaments from Croatia to Ireland is ended. I commend the Croatian police because I hear in Dublin that that they were successful in intercepting a huge haul of guns, detonators and plastic explosives destined for the Real IRA. However, the Garda Siochana has since confirmed that the Real IRA managed to smuggle an undisclosed number of weapons and bomb-making equipment out of the Balkans to Ireland. For us in the island of Ireland, that is bad news, so I ask the authorities to look into that." (Honouring of obligations and commitments by Croatia resumed debate, Mr Taylor (United Kingdom, 26 SEPTEMBER 2000).

ponedjeljak, 24. kolovoza 2020.

Are We All Getting "Nuked" in Kosovo? 13-Mar-2007

https://www.nato.int/Kfor/chronicle/2001/nr_010124.htm

Are We All Getting "Nuked" in Kosovo?
Text: Lt-Cdr. Rune Berge -- Photo: S J Lewis RM

PRISTINA: For the last couple of weeks, speculations about Depleted Uranium have spread faster in the world press than a storm in the Bermuda Triangle. But still we do not have a proper answer to the main question in this topic: Are we all getting nuked in Kosovo?
"No", says Bernard Kouchner, former United Nations Administrator in Kosovo and one of the founders of Medecins sans Frontieres, winners of the Nobel Peace Prize.
"According to my experience as Health Minister of France, there is no threat here. That is not to say I'm not taking this seriously. On the contrary, I'm suggesting that an independent body, such as Friends of Earth, should come and freely make their own exploration and investigation", he says in an UNMIK press release.
Just a few days before he resigned as the UN Administrator in Kosovo, he visited a site that had clearly been under heavy attack during the 1999 air strikes. At the site, in the town of Klina in western Kosovo, the Italian Brigade's Nuclear Biological-Chemical unit demonstrated their techniques of seeking radiation left by depleted uranium.
"The brigades check continuously all over Kosovo, and continuously they return to see if the level is higher than normal", Dr. Kouchner told media at the scene.
He also mentioned that the results from the tests done on soldiers by the United Nations Environmental Program would be known in February.
"We have also requested Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, the head of the World Health Organization, to send specialists to Kosovo to do an investigation on the health of the population."
Questioned whether he is concerned about the risk of depleted uranium, he responded:
"I am concerned, but not worried. We are taking it seriously. But worried about the consequences of an eventual relationship between depleted uranium and cancer? No!"
Same level of radioactivity in Sweden and Italy
Previously in November a scientific team of the United Nations Environmental Program confirmed that there is not a high risk from depleted uranium in Kosovo.
According to NATO, depleted uranium was used in 112 sites in Kosovo. In those sites, scientists measured slightly higher beta and gamma radioactivity during an examination last year.
"We don't consider that risky, because the same level of radioactivity is found in natural background in some areas in Sweden and Italy", Pekka Haavisto, Chief of UNEP Assessment Team, said in Pristina in November last year.
The team of 14 scientists, which he led, was also in Kosovo last October. On their second trip to Kosovo, the scientist examined eleven sites in southern and western Kosovo, taking soil and water samples, plus taking vegetation samples including milk samples from cows at the sites visited.
He called for precautions to be taken especially when dealing directly with penetrates and sabots at the sites, as the final conclusions of the scientific assessment team can only be made after obtaining the results from laboratory analyses.
"In Kosovo you have many other more serious environmental risks connected to the air pollution, waste treatment and management", Haavisto also added.



Use of DU weapons could be war crime
ITALY, Rome -- NATO's use of depleted uranium could be investigated as a possible war crime, the chief prosecutor for the international war crimes tribunal has said.
Carla del Pronte told Italian state TV on Sunday: "If we have sufficient elements we will be obliged to investigate" as to whether the use of the heavy metal in the Balkans conflicts constituted a war crime.
Numerous NATO member states, including Italy, are currently carrying out their own health and scientific investigations into a possible link between the use of the radioactive weapons used during the Balkan wars and cancer-related deaths among servicemen serving in the region.
The latest country to embark on an investigation is Switzerland. Its defense ministry said on Sunday that it's planned to check the health implications of DU weapons test-fired in central Switzerland 30 years ago.
U.N. plays GENEVA, Switzerland -- The World Health Organisation (WHO) says it is "unlikely" that depleted uranium ammunition used by NATO troops could have caused cancer.
The Geneva-based United Nations health agency on Friday issued its first recommendation on the ammunition since the beginning of the current controversy over potential health risks.
The body concluded it was "unlikely" that exposure to NATO weapons containing depleted uranium could have led to a higher risk of cancer among military personnel who served in the Balkan conflicts.
But it said that it was planning a study to "assess whether there has been an increased rate of cancer amongst military personnel who served in the Gulf War or Balkans, as well as amongst exposed populations," CNN reports.

četvrtak, 20. kolovoza 2020.

SKANDAL U HRVATSKOJ VOJSCI/ Scandal in Croatian Army (The Nacional, 2002-05-08)

http://arhiva.nacional.hr/clanak/10234/25-hrvatskih-generala-su-prevaranti-svjesno-su-prevarili-drzavu-kako-bi-dobili-invalidski-status-i-povlastice

Objavljeno u Nacionalu br. 338, 2002-05-08
SKANDAL U HRVATSKOJ VOJSCI

25 hrvatskih generala su prevaranti Svjesno su prevarili državu kako bi dobili invalidski status i povlastice

Postati invalid donosilo je generalima čak dvadesetak beneficija: uz invalidninu, bili su oslobođeni plaćanja poreza i prireza na plaću, mogli su uvoziti automobile bez carine, imali su pravo na dječji doplatak i jednokratnu pomoć koja je dosezala nekoliko tisuća DEM
Haaški optuženik Rahim Ademi također je stekao status invalida pod sumnjivim okolnostimaHaaški optuženik Rahim Ademi također je stekao status invalida pod sumnjivim okolnostimaSvi ratni invalidi imaju pravo na jednokratnu novčanu pomoć, tako da je na toj osnovi Janko Bobetko dobio 27.000 kuna, Branimir Glavaš 17.600, Ante Gotovina 13.990, a Ante Budimir 11.200 kuna. Tu su i osigurnine koje su svakomu donijele između tisuću i četiri tisuće DEM, kao i niz drugih pogodnosti. Novi Zakon o pravima hrvatskih branitelja, koji je Sabor usvojio lani u listopadu, bitno je reducirao privilegije dosadašnjih korisnika koji sada moraju plaćati porez i prirez, nemaju zajamčen dječji doplatak, a značajno su smanjene invalidnine, pa tako Janko Bobetko više ne prima 6400 nego 3600 kuna mjesečno. Jedan 90-postotni ratni invalid koji mjesečno zarađuje 12.000 kuna potvrdio je za Nacional da će zbog tih redukcija ove godine njegovi prihodi biti umanjeni za oko 74.000 kuna u odnosu na 2001. i prijašnje godine.
Generali čija je invalidnost pravno neupitna: Đuro Dečak (20 posto, zbog zatočeništva u vojnom zatvoru), Luka Džanko (40 posto, ranjen 11. ožujka 1993. na novigradskom ratištu), Milenko Filipović (30 posto, ranjen 6. travnja 1992. od snajperskog hica), Željko Glasnović (30 posto, ranjen 10. travnja 1992. na južnom bojištu), Ante Gotovina (50 posto, ranjen 11. prosinca 1991. u zapadnoj Slavoniji), Ivan Korade (90 posto, ranjen 16. lipnja 1992.), Damir Krstičević (40 posto, ranjavanje prilikom slučajnog opaljenja vlastite puške 17. travnja 1994. na južnom bojištu), Mladen Kruljac (30 posto, ranjen tri puta, 30. kolovoza 1991., 25. travnja 1992. i 19. srpnja 1992.), Drago Lovrić (60 posto, ranjen 29. kolovoza 1992.), Nojko Marinović (90 posto, ranjen 19. ožujka 1992. i bolestan, medicinska dokumentacija o ranjavanju je uredna, a što se tiče priznavanja statusa na temelju bolesti, medicinska dokumentacija ne potječe iz razdoblja propisanog zakonom) i Žarko Tole (100 posto, u zarobljeništvu proveo 14 mjeseci).Dvije godine nakon prvih najava revizije generalskih invalidnina, ovih će dana vodećim hrvatskim političarima biti dostavljeni definitivni podaci o golemim malverzacijama u koje su gotovo cijelo desetljeće uključeni visoki časnici Hrvatske vojske. Rezultati revizije porazno svjedoče o nesagledivoj korupciji vojnog vrha: od 54 generala u HV-u tri četvrtine, ili točno 37, stekle su status vojnog invalida. Najmanje 25 generala, tek malo manje od 50 posto, postalo je invalidima na vrlo sumnjive načine, od stradanja u prometnim nesrećama daleko od linije fronte, što je snašlo čak devetoricu visokih zapovjednika oružanih snaga, preko priznavanja raznih srčanih bolesti ili dijabetesa i astme, koje su vukli desetljećima otprije, pa do padova u šahtove ili niz za život opasne stube u Ministarstvu obrane.
Dok je predsjednik države bio Franjo Tuđman, a ministar obrane Gojko Šušak, generalom se postajalo bez ikakvih kriterija. Najviši vojni čin dobivale su osobe sa završenom osnovnom školom poput Ante Gotovine, vozač autobusa Ljubo Ćesić, poznatiji kao Rojs, autoprijevoznik Mile Ćuk ili konobar Mirko Norac. Osim statusne satisfakcije, čin generala je, zahvaljujući dodacima na plaću, donosio i prihode od barem desetak tisuća kuna mjesečno te prednost pri rješavanju stambenog pitanja. Stoga ne iznenađuje da su potkraj 1999. u Hrvatskoj vojsci bila čak 54 generala, dok je glomazna JNA imala oko 130 generala. Drugim riječima, u militariziranoj bivšoj Jugoslaviji jedan general dolazio je na 160.000 stanovnika, a u Hrvatskoj na upola manje građana.
No najnoviji dokumenti pokazuju da za gotovo tri četvrtine ovdašnjih generala najviši činovi nisu bili dovoljni nego su odlučili prigrabiti beneficije što ih donosi status ratnih invalida. Uzme li se u obzir da je njih 25 steklo taj status u vrlo sumnjivim okolnostima, gotovo svaki drugi general HV-a mutnim je poslovima iskamčio znatnu financijsku korist.
Popis sumnjivaca je reprezentativan jer je riječ o generalima koji su 90-ih slovili kao organizatori obrane i predvodnici otpora velikosrpskoj agresiji – a mnogi među njima povlašteni položaj i materijalno su učvrstili povlasticama kakve donosi status invalida: bivši načelnik Glavnog stožera Janko Bobetko, zapovjednik Operativne zone Đakovo Slavko Barić, HDZ-ov dugogodišnji saborski zastupnik Branimir Glavaš, haaški optuženik Rahim Ademi, Vinko Vrbanac, Marinko Krešić, Mirko Šundov, Vlado Hodalj, generali HVO-a Zlatan Mijo Jelić i Stanko Sopta, šef vojne policije Mate Laušić i desetak drugih bivših zapovjednika Hrvatske vojske.
Paradoksalno, Vladine su službe otkrile da su za razliku od navedenih invalidski status na pošten način zaslužili neki od generala osumnjičenih za ratne zločine ili gospodarski kriminal kao što su Ante Gotovina, Mirko Norac, Đuro Dečak i Ivan Korade.
Postati invalid bilo je statusno pitanje, a taj je status donosio čak dvadesetak beneficija poput invalidnine, neplaćanja poreza i prireza na plaću, mogućnost uvoza auta bez državnih nameta, prava na dječji doplatak i jednokratne pomoći do čak nekoliko tisuća njemačkih maraka. Već najmanja priznata invalidnost od 20 posto generalu s plaćom od 8000 kuna svakog je mjeseca jamčila još barem 3000 kuna. Zato ne iznenađuje to što su mnogi generali shvatili da su invalidi godinama nakon prometnih nesreća, navodnih ranjavanja ili kotrljanja niz stubišta.
Državno izvješće otkriva još dva dosad zatajena podatka. Prvo, s polovicom generala invalida Hrvatska vojska je apsolutno bez premca među oružanim silama u svijetu s velikim brojem stradalih visokih časnika. U modernom ratovanju gubici visokog zapovjednog kadra su svedeni na minimum, dok je u HV-u za vladavine Franje Tuđmana i Gojka Šuška cijela stvar postavljena naglavce. Uzme li se kao točna čak i brojka od 32.000 invalida, ispada da je nastradao u najgorem slučaju svaki deseti ratnik, dok je biti general bilo peterostruko riskantnije za zdravlje i život. I drugo, čak ako revizija i otkloni sumnju za neke generale, to što je gotovo 70 posto njih na sumnjiv način steklo povlastice odaje mizerne moralne standarde u Hrvatskoj vojsci. Usporedbe radi, od približno 185 nižih časnika sa statusom invalida, u tijeku je revizija kod manje od jedne trećine, što implicira da se spuštanjem zapovjednog lanca podizala razina poštenja.
Iako Rahima Ademija, jednog od najškolovanijih hrvatskih časnika, Sud u Haagu sumnjiči kao odgovornog za kršenje ratnih konvencija u vojnoj operaciji Medački džep u jesen 1993., uvijek je ostavljao dojam besprijekornog profesionalca. Ali prema izvješću vojne policije od 24. veljače 2000. ispada da je bez adekvatnih dokaza postao 40-postotni invalid jer mu je ozlijeđeno desno koljeno. Premda u obrascima koje je potpisao njegov zapovjednik Ante Gotovina stoji da je prvi put koljeno ozlijedio 11. rujna 1993. u operaciji “Džet 93”, a zatim i u studenome dok je u okolici Siska obilazio hrvatsko topništvo, istražitelji su uočili da nigdje u službenoj dokumentaciji MORH-a nema podatka o dvjema Ademijevim ozljedama koje su ga učinile invalidom. Osim toga, tek više od dva mjeseca nakon ozljeđivanja javio se u zagrebačku Novu bolnicu u kojoj je njegova povijest bolesti.
Stožerni general Janko Bobetko bio je 100-postotni invalid i dok je zapovijedao Glavnim stožerom. Osamdeset posto invalidnosti vukao je još iz II. svjetskog rata kad je bio ranjen u nogu, da bi u Hrvatskoj vojsci početkom 1994. obolio od kardijalne dekompenzacije, tako da je zbog srčane mane morao ležati u bolnici i u doba operacije “Bljesak” i oslobađanju zapadne Slavonije. Uskoro je proglašen 100-postotnim invalidom, ali povjerenstvo Ministarstva obrane predvođeno Zvonimirom Červenkom smanjilo je Bobetkovu invalidnost na 80 posto. Bio je to uvod u žestoku svađu dvojice generala koji su se uzajamno vrijeđali za nesposobnost, a na kraju je pobijedio Bobetko jer je Upravi sud poništio Červenkov nalaz i presudio u korist njegova prethodnika. Zahvaljujući potpori suda, Bobetko je, uz mirovinu i brojne povlastice, mjesečno samo od invalidnine tržio 6400 kuna.
Status 100-postotnog invalida I. skupine kao dijabetičar i ranjenik iz II. svjetskog rata dobio je i Bobetkov suborac i vršnjak general Đuro Srnec. Povjerenstvo Ministarstva hrvatskih branitelja ukinulo mu je taj status i njegov je predmet na Upravnom sudu.
Dugogodišnjem tjelesnom čuvaru Franje Tuđmana i zapovjedniku 1. gardijskog zdruga generalu Mili Ćuku trebalo je osam godina da zatraži priznavanje invalidnosti koju je stekao 29. lipnja 1999. U svom zahtjevu Ćuk je naveo da je u rujnu 1991 odbačen u eksploziji granate pri zauzimanju bjelovarskog skladišta Barutana. Među brojnim nelogičnostima u dokumentaciji koju je priložio nalazi se i podatak da je nastradao kao pripadnik MUP-a, a potvrdu o stradavanju (bez klase i urudžbenog broja) izdalo mu je Ministarstvo obrane, zahvaljujući čemu je i proglašen 50-postotnim invalidom. Vlada je Ćuku ukinula invalidski status i njegov je slučaj na Upravnom sudu.
No dok se za bivšeg zapovjednika Tuđmanove najvjernije vojne postrojbe još može vjerovati da je sudjelovao u sukobima s neprijateljem i tako se ozlijedio, sudeći po broju nastradalih generala u automobilskim nesrećama, za većinu njih opasnije su bile krivine i okuke nego četnici. Tako je 23. siječnja 1993. vozeći se u Koprivnicu stradao general Slavko Barić koji je tom prilikom slomio kuk, rebro, a ozlijedio je još glavu i kralježnicu. Potvrdu da se nalazio na službenom putu Bariću je potpisao Đuro Dečak i 15. listopada 1992. Barić je proglašen 50-postotnim invalidom.

Visina mjesečnih invalidnina
100 posto I. grupa (6400 kn)
100 posto II. grupa (4700 kn)
90 posto (3500 kn)
80 posto (2600 kn)
70 posto (1800 kn)
60 posto (1100 kn)
50 posto (770 kn)
40 posto (380 kn)
30 posto (280 kn)
20 posto (190 kn)
Slična sudbina snašla je i Branimira Glavaša kad je potpisano primirje između Hrvatske i JNA. Slomljeno lijevo rebro bilo je dovoljno da Glavaš bude proglašen 40-postotnim invalidom Domovinskog rata. Nastradao je kao suvozač 29. siječnja 1992. u okolici Bjelovara, no trebalo je proteći gotovo šest godina dok 19. studenoga 1997. nije podnio zahtjev za priznavanje invalidnosti. U međuvremenu je donesen zakon koji je ratnim invalidima osigurao mnoge povlastice i Glavaš je – što je odlukom komisije i potvrđeno – odlučio iskoristiti slomljeno rebro kako bi postao ratni invalid. Glavašev je slučaj još po nečemu zanimljiv: Vladino povjerenstvo je HDZ-ovu saborskom zastupniku ukinulo invalidnost, no ona mu je zajedno sa svim beneficijama, odlukom Upravnog suda vraćena 14. ožujka ove godine. Gotovo je identičan slučaj generala Ante Budimira koji je stradao u prometnoj nesreći kod Makarske 3. listopada 1992. Budimir je putovao na pogreb u Dubrovnik, a status 50-postotnog invalida stekao je iako kraj gdje je nastradao nije bio u zoni ratnih djelovanja.
General Živko Budimir sudario se vozeći automobil 14. siječnja 1994. u mjestu Vuka u okolici Osijeka. Zahtjev za utvrđivanjem invalidnosti uputio je nakon više od dvije godine i od prosinca 1996. on je invalid, a i ovih 20 posto osigurava mu sva prava iz Zakona o hrvatskim braniteljima. Povjerenstvo hrvatske Vlade ukinulo je prije dvije godine invalidske statuse i Anti i Živku Budimiru i njihovi su predmeti još na Upravnom sudu.
Zapovjednik Vojne policije Mate Laušić također je na listi generala invalida stradalih na nesigurnim hrvatskim prometnicama. Laušić je zaglavio 23. travnja 1992. vraćajući se iz Osijeka u Zagreb i dijagnosticirana mu je 50-postotna invalidnost koju mu je ukinulo Vladino povjerenstvo. U nejasnim okolnostima od ozljeda zadobivenih u prometnoj nesreći 20-postotni invalidom proglašen je i general Ilija Maričić, kojem je Ministarstvo hrvatskih branitelja ukinulo povlašteni status. No dok se Laušić nije žalio na odluku vlasti, Maričić je nije prihvatio i o njegovoj tužbi također će odlučiti Upravni sud.
Kao 40-postotni invalid vodi se i nekadašnji zapovjednik HVO-a i glavni svjedok na haaškom procesu Tihomiru Blaškiću general Milivoj Petković. Dokumenti o Petkovićevu potresu mozga i ozljedi kralježnice koje je zadobio u lipnju 1992. vozeći automobil pokraj, kako piše u dokumentima “lijeve obale rijeke Neretve”, donijeli su službenici tzv. Hrvatske zajednice Herceg Bosne. Na novogodišnje jutro 1994. u automobilskom incidentu kod Sukošana nesreću je doživio i general Mirko Šundov. Bio je to dovoljan razlog da ga se proglasi 30-postotnim invalidom, i to tek u srpnju 1997. Vladino povjerenstvo Šundovu je oduzelo status i njegov je slučaj također na Upravnom sudu.
Prijeratni pjesnik, a poslije glasnogovornik MORH-a general Ivan Tolj 20. prosinca 1993. slupao se s automobilom u okolici Dubrovnika u kojem tada nije bilo nikakvih ratnih djelovanja. Ipak, 8. srpnja 1998. priznata mu je 80-postotna invalidnost koju mu je u ljeto 2000. ukinulo povjerenstvo hrvatske Vlade.
Jedna od najbizarnijih nesreća snašla je generala Vladu Hodalja, zaposlenog u Vojnom učilištu na Črnomercu, koji je ratni invalid postao u danima kad je rat u Hrvatskoj već završio. Hodalj je, ne sluteći pogibelj, kao i svakog drugog dana, i tog 17. rujna 1995. hodao Glavnim stožerom HV-a, no pritom se spotaknuo i postao 30-postotni ratni invalid. Slična nezgoda unesrećila je nekoliko dana prije i generala Josipa Ignaca koji je 5. rujna 1995. prilikom inspekcije relejnog centra na Ćelavcu blizu Splita postao invalidom, kako stoji u službenim dokumentima, “uslijed pada niz stepenice u prazan prostor dubine 3-4 metra, udarivši glavom i kralježnicom u metalni okrugli rezervoar, što je pojačalo zdravstvene tegobe glede glavobolje, vrtoglavice te bolova u vratnom dijelu kralježnice i ruku”. Ignac je kralježnicu počeo liječiti još 1988., a status 60-postotnog invalida zbog bolesti kralježnice i bronhijalne astme dodijeljen mu je u travnju 1996.
Dugogodišnji načelnik Uprave za graditeljstvo Ministarstva obrane Matko Kakarigi podnio je u svibnju 1997. zahtjev za priznanje invalidnosti “zbog pogoršanja bolesti diabetes mellitus”. Prvostupanjska komisija odbila je Kakarigijev zahtjev, ali on je 23. travnja 1999. podnio novi zbog pogoršanog zdravstvenog stanja i ubrzo potom, nakon dvadesetak dana kao šećerni bolesnik postao je 40-postotni ratni invalid. Nalaz vojne policije iz srpnja 2000. utvrdio je da Kakarigijeva bolest nema veze s ratom jer je dijagnosticirana još 1988., a njeno pogoršanje nije bilo moguće povezati s boravkom u oružanim snagama jer general nije sudjelovao u vojnim operacijama. Osim toga, Kakarigi je rješenjem MORH-a od 25. veljače 1992. bio proglašen nesposobnim za vojnu službu, ali je narednih sedam godina ostao na iznimno važnim položajima unutar istog ministarstva. Vladino povjerenstvo je Kakarigiju ukinulo invalidske povlastice, no one su mu vraćene odlukom Upravnog suda od 14. ožujka 2002.
Nekadašnji zapovjednik 5. gardijske brigade iz Vinkovaca Ivan Kapular postao je 30-postotnim invalidom jer je naveo kako je braneći Vukovar ranjen tri puta, iako do veljače 1995. nije imao ni jedan liječnički dokaz o vlastitom ranjavanju. U svom zahtjevu Kapular je dodao i kako je 21. veljače 1995. ranjen na južnom bojištu, ali otkriveno je da je lagao jer je prema podacima vojne policije na to bojište stigao tek u lipnju te godine, četiri mjeseca nakon navodnog ranjavanja. Unatoč takvim podacima general Kapular je već u listopadu 1995. proglašen invalidom.
Ratujući u okolici Bosanskog Broda 18. i 26. rujna 1992. Marinko Krešić je od eksplozije minobacačke granate zadobio jak udarac u vrat. Koliko je udarac bio snažan, pokazuje i to što je potvrdu o invalidnosti zatražio nakon punih pet godina i 28. svibnja 1998. procijenjeno je da je 70-postotni invalid. Sumnje u Krešićevo ranjavanje na posavskom ratištu pojačalo je i službeno izvješće vojne policije koja je otkrila da ni u jednoj službenoj evidenciji stradalnikove 102. brigade nema podataka o njegovu ranjavanju, kao i da su liječničke potvrde o ozljedi vrata prilično sporne (Krešić je naveo da je ranjen, a liječnici da je nagnječio kralježnicu i doživio trzajnu ozljedu vrata). Je li Krešić doista invalid, odlučiti će Upravni sud.
Tridesetpostotni invalid je i Jozo Miličević, bivši zapovjednik 1. gardijske brigade Tigrovi. Miličević je tvrdio da je nastradao kod Dvora na Uni 19. rujna 1995. kad su mu zbog detonacije granate ozlijeđeni glava, vrat i kralježnica, a oštećen mu je i sluh. Revizija Ministarstva branitelja utvrdila je da Miličevićeva dokumentaciju nisu ovjerili ni nadležni liječnik ni medicinska ustanova. A zdravstveni karton zapovjednika Tigrova prepun je sumnjivih precrtanih i podebljanih datuma javljanja liječnicima.
Vrlo su upitni i načini kako je 20-postotnim invalidom postao nekadašnji načelnik Operativne uprave Glavnog stožera general Vinko Vrbanac. Tvrdio je da je u akciji “Tvigi” 12. veljače 1994. ranjen ispod lijevog oka, no prvi je put zbog navodnog ranjavanja bolnicu posjetio nakon godinu dana. Uz to je tvrdio da zbog ranjavanja pati od teških neurotičnih poremećaja i, premda nije priložio ni jedan dokument koji bi dokazao njegove probleme, ipak je proglašen invalidom. Kad je Vrbancu ukinut status ratnog invalida, i on se pridružio generalima koji su Ministarstvo branitelja tužili Upravnom sudu, u nadi da će im pravosuđe priznati da su bolesni.
Neuvjerljiva je i liječnička dokumentacija 30-postotnog invalida generala Stanka Sopte, koji je prije rata uhićen pri provali u automobil. Prema dokumentima što ih je potpisao Marinko Krešić, ispisanim ručno i bez bilo kakvih oznaka službenih postrojbi kojima je ranjenik pripadao, tijekom 1993. Sopta je triput ranjavan na južnom bojištu. A u medicinskoj anamnezi piše da je liječen na mostarskoj kirurgiji, dok se ispod nalazi žig “Ratna bolnica Herceg Bosna, Grude”, i to bez liječnikova potpisa. Ni medicinska dokumentacija zagrebačke bolnice Sveti Duh nije ovjerena, zbog čega je upitno je li Sopta legalno stekao invalidski status.
General Sergio Rabar razvojačen je 1. travnja 1994., a u lipnju sljedeće godine dijagnosticirano mu je psihičko oboljenje zbog čega je proglašen 40-postotnim invalidom. Vladino povjerenstvo ukinulo mu je status, a Rabar ga je tužio Upravnom sudu. Zbog dijabetesa, gluhoće, srčanih tegoba i PTSP-a kao 40-postotni invalid vodi se Rudi Stipčić. Zbog psihičkih smetnji, dijabetesa i problema s kralježnicom 70-postotni invalid je postao general Mate Viduka.
Popis sumnjivih generala invalida uskoro će biti dostavljen predsjedniku Republike Stipi Mesiću, premijeru Ivici Račanu i članovima njegova kabineta. Dokument koji posjeduje Nacional razobličava desničarsku floskulu o generalima kao besprijekornim domoljubima koji su idealistički prvi krenuli u obranu napadnute domovine. Djelomice je to istina, ali način na koji su prigrabili invalidski status pokazuje i da mnogi među njima nisu kasnili ni kad su se dijelile izdašne povlastice. Zato nakon objavljivanja imena visokorangiranih varalica državna vlast mora pokrenuti i postupke protiv krivaca za posvemašnju degradaciju zakona i morala u HV-u. Uostalom, ne raščisti li s dokazanim manipulatorima, pitanje je na koji će način Račan ili Radoš na jesen zatražiti od 13.000 zaposlenih da napuste oružane snage.




utorak, 18. kolovoza 2020.

Erik Prince: American Bin Laden - CIA Asset, Money & Gunmen (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2009/12/4/810764/-?fbclid=IwAR2la7bBBRXR29RE0cyCCCU483_yb6qleeVsvKnbIM2yfgKp5c9uAolvu28)

Erik Prince is the American Osama Bin Laden: a CIA asset with a lot of money and gunmen working for him.
The parallels extend further than recent reports that Prince was a paid CIA agent. See, http://www.theatlanticwire.com/...
The top people at Blackwater were CIA managers who ran a number of double-agents within al-Qaeda as Agency assets until 9/11. Before he headed a Blackwater subsidiary, Cofer Black was CIA Chief of Station in Khartoum in the mid-1990s at the time that bin Laden, Ali Mohamed, KSM and many other major terrorist figures were running CIA-assisted paramilitary operations against the Serbs and Russians from bases in Sudan.  Al-Qaeda continued to operate against the Russians until 9/11, and at least thirteen of the 19 hijackers were originally recruited and trained to fight in Bosnia, Kosovo and Chechnya.(1) Erik Prince also got his start as a Special Forces Operator in Bosnia.
But, that's just the beginning of the strange network that binds together a group of CIA alumni, Blackwater, and al-Qaeda.  MORE, below . . .
1991 - 2001: The CIA-al Qaeda Relationship From Afghanistan to 9/11
Introduction
The U.S. has never officially acknowledged its role in covert operations that occurred inside the breakaway Muslim areas of the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia during the 1990s. Aside from the open U.S. military intervention that followed the November 1995 Dayton Peace Accord that ostensibly ended major hostilities in Bosnia, U.S. intelligence operations in the region remain classified.  It is an open secret, however, that in the civil wars that followed in Bosnia, Kosovo, Dagestan, and Chechnya, the Central Intelligence Agency worked with several Islamic states, including Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Morocco, and Iran, and had a cooperative role in arming, financing, and training their paramilitaries and allied mercenary groups and various Jihadist organizations, including what we know today as al-Qaeda.
Because the CIA role is still classified, important details about the relationships between Jihadist groups and U.S. intelligence remain obscured, particularly the contacts with Usama bin Laden and other al-Qaeda figures. This is an important part of trying to piece together a more accurate picture of the events and motives that led up to the 9/11 and related attacks.  It is simply impossible to understand why 9/11 and the USS Cole attacks happened as they did without knowing more about the details of the relationship between U.S. intelligence and non-state actors, such as bin Laden, as well as other private intelligence contractors, particularly those who would go on to run Blackwater, and paramilitary splinter groups.
As anyone who has tried to put together the pieces must acknowledge, there are huge gaps in the official record.  The narrative must remain provisional unless and until key individuals involved reveal what they know.  Some of them never will.  What facts we do know have been assembled below.        
1993-95 - Cofer Black and Bin Laden in Khartoum
Black has admitted in Congressional testimony that in 1995 he met bin Laden in Sudan.  He is the only CIA officer who admits to having direct contact with UBL since the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan ended in 1989. By Black's telling, it was an angry, armed mano-a-mano, shortly after which they both left the country.[2]
Larger events indicate that Osama bin Laden had a far more cooperative and recent relationship with the CIA than is publicly acknowledged.  The partnership did not end with the 1989 Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan. Indeed, Bin Laden was central to the secret U.S. war against the Serbs and in the oil-rich region of the former Soviet Republics in the Transcaucasus and Central Asia that followed the 1991 breakup of the Soviet Union.  It is not by coincidence that the head of covert Saudi paramilitary forces moved to Sudan in 1991.  That man was Osama bin Laden, and his distancing from the Royal Court at Riyadh gave both room to operate more freely at a time of tension over the U.S. presence inside Saudi Arabia and a coordinated offensive to strip off some of the most valuable real estate of the collapsing Soviet empire.
UBL: Double-Agent
Numerous accounts point to the conclusion that bin Laden never fully severed his ties with his Saudi intelligence handlers in 1991.  Far from it.  Given the partnership between the U.S. and Saudi intelligence establishments, and their coordinated paramilitary operations against Russia and Serbia, and their allies throughout the 1990s, the separation between al-Qaeda and the CIA can be measured as only a fraction of a degree, and overall can be characterized as more cooperative than hostile for most of the decade.  
This conclusion is backed up by the fact that Bin Laden was allowed to leave Saudi Arabia in 1991 with his own private fortune intact, accompanied by several hundred of his loyal Mujaheddin fighters. In secret, the Saudi Royals continued to fund bin Laden and his forces, allegedly with the understanding that they would direct their wrath at targets outside Saudi Arabia. By striking that deal, Bin Laden effectively acted as a double-agent for the ruling regime, diverting the fundamentalist opposition from internal overthrow. [Posner, 2003, pp. 40-42] Posner states the Saudis “effectively had [bin Laden] on their payroll since the start of the decade.” [Time, 8/31/2003] This arrangement is reaffirmed by the additional tranches paid to bin Laden in 1996 and 1998 by the Saudi Royal family. Alain Chouet, head of French counter-terrorism, echoes the conclusion that bin Laden’s 1994 “loss of Saudi nationality is nothing but a farce.” [Le Monde (Paris), 4/15/2007]  Martin Indyk, Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs under President Clinton, writes in Foreign Affairs,
“The Saudis had protected themselves by co-opting and accommodating the Islamist extremists in their midst, a move they felt was necessary in the uncertain aftermath of the Gulf War. ... [O]nce Crown Prince Abdullah assumed the regency in 1996, the ruling family set about the determined business of buying off its opposition.” The regime allowed global charities to be “subverted,” turning them into channels for diverting unofficial funds to bin Laden's paramilitaries and allied Jihadist groups. “[T]he Clinton administration indulged Riyadh’s penchant for buying off trouble as long as the regime also paid its huge arms bills, purchased Boeing aircraft, kept the price of oil within reasonable bounds, and allowed the United States to use Saudi air bases to enforce the southern no-fly zone over Iraq and launch occasional military strikes to contain Saddam Hussein.” [Foreign Affairs, 1/1/2002]
 
Cofer Black: Chief of Station, Agent Handler
In 1993, a new CIA station chief flew into Khartoum.  Cofer Black arrived with an intense focus on bin Laden, one that would be his primary mission for most of the the rest of his CIA career.  When Black started working in Sudan, Bin Laden was not considered to be the worldwide terrorist mastermind that he would come to be portrayed as after 9/11.  He was something else, something between a CIA operational asset and a subject of surveillance, but not a target of disruption.
Not that bin Laden was the type who the CIA would recruit at Embassy cocktail parties.  He was viewed as what he was: a ranking Saudi financial and logistical operator, an agent controlled by a "friendly" intelligence service, one who commanded and trained some very dangerous but useful elements. The standing orders were to the effect of keep your eye on him, but hands off.  So, that's what happened.  Until the final months of their stay in Sudan, Black did not interfere with UBL.  
Not that Bin Laden wasn't already considered a threat in some quarters of US intelligence.  After the February 26, 1993 WTC bombing, Bin Laden's name came up as one of the associates of Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman and as the financial backer of the Martyr Azzam Hostel in Peshawar where Ramzi Yousef had stayed. Bin Laden's name, along with names of more than 118 others (plus the Sudanese mission to the United States), was included on a list, distributed by federal prosecutors, of potential unindicted co-conspirators.  But, the US never sought his extradition from Sudan, and the CIA station in Khartoum never actually made any effort to snatch him, as occurred shortly after Black's arrival to Carlos the Jackal, who was captured in Khartoum by Black's men and renditioned to France for trial.  
There were many interesting characters running around Khartoum at this time.  One of whom was Ali Mohamed, a double agent for the CIA and al-Qaeda who had helped Bin Laden move to Sudan from Afghanistan in the summer of 1991. Mohamed, a former Egyptian Army officer who enlisted in the U.S. Army, was intimately involved in planning the WTC bombing, returned to Sudan for ten months starting in February 1994 to train bin Laden's bodyguards.  Mohamed will later testify at his trial following the 1998 East Africa Embassy bombings, “In late 1994, I received a call from an FBI agent who wanted to speak to me about the upcoming trial of United States vs. Abdul Rahman. I flew back to the United States, spoke to the FBI, but didn’t disclose everything that I knew.” [Washington File, 5/15/2001; Wall Street Journal, 11/26/2001; 9/11 Commission, 6/16/2004]  Despite admitting this tie to bin Laden, there are no apparent repercussions for Mohamed (or bin Laden), aside from his name appearing along with bin Laden's on the trial’s unindicted co-conspirators list. [Lance, 2006, pp. 173-174] He will not appear at the trial, and it has been alleged the one of the prosecutors told Mohamed to ignore a subpoena and not testify (see December 1994-January 1995). Mohamed was allowed to freely run around the world for another three years, despite the fact that he was a known bin Laden associate who had helped mix the bomb that exploded in the garage of the World Trade Center.
Rather than being isolated and besieged in Sudan at the time Black was Chief of Station, UBL, like Mohamed, freely moved in and out of Sudan during his time there.  He was part of an official Saudi delegation to Albania in 1994, where he set up paramilitary cells that would strike out into Kosovo.  This morphed into a splinter group of the Kosovo Liberation Army that continued to receive Saudi and CIA assistance for the rest of the decade.
Bin Laden continued his travels, shuttling to Bosnia on numerous occasions even after the Dayton Peace Agreement (which bin Laden violently opposed) was initialed on November 20, 1995. Bin Laden frequently flew in and out of Khartoum International Airport aboard an executive jet purchased for him in the United States in 1993, and used several satellite phones also bought in the U.S.; 1100 calls from these phones were de-encrypted and analyzed by U.S. intelligence before bin Laden stopped using them regularly in 1998.  All the while, Al-Qaeda continued large scale paramilitary operations in Kosovo, Chechnya, Dagestan and elsewhere in the former southern Soviet and Yugoslav region. As late as 2000, Bin Laden is reported to have traveled to Kosovo directing al-Qaeda units of the KLA attacking the Serbs.(4)
Six days before the Bosnia Accord was signed, a powerful truck bomb ripped through the offices of the Saudi National Guard in Riyadh, killing five U.S. trainers and wounding 34 other Americans working for Vinnell Corp. (then owned by the Carlyle Group) in an attack for which bin Laden denied involvement but was later indicted by a U.S. Grand Jury.  A few days later, several gunmen were killed as they tried to storm bin Laden's Khartoum compound.  Billy Waugh, a CIA contract agent posted in Khartoum, approached Black with an alternative idea -- which Black "loved" but rejected -- of grabbing bin Laden in a carjacking and dumping his body on the grounds of the Iranian Embassy, so that Iran would be blamed.  
But, neither killing nor renditioning Osama bin Laden was a CIA priority at that time.  As Steve Coll acknowledges in Ghost Wars , which includes an account of bin Laden and Black in Sudan, "American strategy in 1995," Coll writes, "was to contain and frustrate Iran and Iraq."  Coll continues at p. 277, http://books.google.com/...
"In this mission, Saudi Arabia was an essential but illusive ally.  Then, too, there was the crucial importance of Saudi Arabia in the global oil markets . . . There was little impetus to step back and ask, big uncomfortable questions about whether Saudi charities represented a fundamental threat to American national security. The Saudis worked assiduously to maintain contacts with the CIA, outside of official channels.  Several retired Riyadh station chiefs and senior Near East Division managers went on the Saudi payroll as consultants during the mid-1990s."  
Until shortly before he left Sudan, bin Laden was still seen and treated by the CIA primarily as a Saudi intelligence asset and as a valuable liaison with Islamist paramilitary groups around the world.  If there was a falling out with the Agency while Cofer Black was station chief in Khartoum, it resulted from bin Laden's refusal to toe the American line in the Bosnian cease-fire, his suspected involvement in the bombing in Riyadh, and bin Laden's own diminished role as global commander of covert Saudi paramilitary forces after Crown Prince Abdullah took power.  Whatever actual conflict occurred between Black and bin Laden did not happen until late in the game in Khartoum, and was likely a result of much larger events and decisions taken about bin Laden at a very high levels in Langley and Riyadh, rather than anything that Black and Waugh might have dreamed up in country.
The official acquiescence of the Saudi regime with the 1995 Bosnia accord signaled a severe blow to bin Laden's own power, prestige and funding.  Wherever Saudi Arabia and its allies had challenged the Russians, al-Qaeda fighters had been the point of the Sunni spear, a Holy Warrior's role that bin Laden relished, and all sources acknowledge, did not willingly give up.
The confluence of two events are pivotal in the decision to distance bin Laden further from the Saudi court.  On November 29, 1995, nine days after the Dayton Accord was initialed, King Faud suffered a massive stroke, and his half-brother, Crown Prince Abdullah assumed power.  Faud lingered in a vegetative state for a decade, during which time succession remained in question. On August 1 2005, Faud died and Abdullah officially ascended to the throne.  Bin Laden did not come out ahead in this untidy transition of power, but he was not altogether abandoned by the regime, either.  He remained under the wing of Prince Turki al Faisal, who at the time of his sudden retirement and departure from Washington on September 4, 2001, had just renewed his 25-year tenure as Director of the Saudi General Intelligence Directorate (GID).
Cofer Black left Sudan in late 1995 shortly before bin Laden removed himself to Afghanistan the following May after reportedly shopping unsuccessfully for political asylum in London.  Black has never publicly specified the exact dates of his departure or the terminal confrontation with bin Laden. One clue about when this happened may be that in October 1995 the FBI received a volume of 40 CIA files on bin Laden, thick with NSA and CIA telephone intercepts of bin Laden's communications in Khartoum acquired over several years.[Miller, Stone, and Mitchell, 2002, pp. 148-149; Wright, 2006, pp. 242-244, cited at http://www.historycommons.org/... ]  UBL would not be placed on the FBI's international Wanted List until just months before the August 1998 East Africa Embassy bombings.
But, just as bin Laden continued to serve Saudi intelligence interests after his "exile" to Sudan, so too did that role follow him in the next step into Afghanistan, after Pakistani ISI intelligence with the backing of the Saudi GID pushed the Taliban into power in Afghanistan.  Bin Laden was an obvious choice for strengthening the Saudi presence in Afghanistan, and bin Laden did not cease being GID's "man in Kandahar" until he reportedly walked out of Tora Bora across unguarded passes into Pakistan in January 2002.  
In a little-noted coincidence in early 1995, Ahmed Badeed, chief of staff to GID head Prince Turki, flew into Kandahar airport to meet with Mullah Omar, the spiritual head of the Taliban, who would soon become bin Laden's right-hand man after his arrival in Afghanistan.  Meanwhile, Cofer Black was appointed Task Force Chief in the CIA Near East and South Asia Division, still focused on bin Laden, a role he would hold for the next three years.
Blowback: Bin Laden Works With the U.S. in Bosnia
Bin Laden had been a critical component in the paramilitary capability of intelligence services of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, as well as the CIA.  His network played a central, coordinated role with the U.S. in Bosnia.  In November, 1994, bin Laden met with the Bosnian President after delivering hundreds of fighters and tonnes of arms from bases in Sudan, at the same time that US envoy Richard Holbrooke and then head of the US European Intelligence Directorate Gen. Michael Hayden were in Bosnia on the same mission.  U.S. Special Forces and bin Laden's Mujahedin carried out joint military operations for a short period in the area around Ploce, Croatia.  The mission in Bosnia included a U.S. Navy Seal named Erik Prince.
Prince's biography shows that after he dropped out of Annapolis, he was with the U.S. Navy SEALs from 1993 to 1996, assigned briefly in Haiti as well as Bosnia -- a curiously short career in that most elite U.S. military units -- in another curious coincidence, this was during the same time frame Cofer Black and bin Laden were in Sudan, and bin Laden was heading logistical support of Saudi paramilitary in Bosnia.  U.S. Special Forces served not only in Bosnia from 1994 on, but also for a time in Kosovo beginning in 1999.(3) This was at a time of increasing infiltration into Southern Serbia of al-Qaeda militias.
Meanwhile, as bin Laden was supposedly holed up in Afghanistan, al Qaeda was stepping up its activities in Chechnya, operations that included the Flt. 77 hijackers and several of the other primary 9/11 operatives.  According to a report in the AP quoting al-Qaeda military instructor Abu Daoud, in May 2000, Osama bin Laden sent four hundred fighters to Chechnya with explosives and weapons. Western intelligence sources confirmed that movement in August 2000. Abu Daoud will also tell the Associated Press that hundreds of other fighters went in February 1999 and many returned to Afghanistan. [Associated Press, 8/30/2000] Two of the 9/11 hijackers, Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, reportedly fought in Chechnya. Several others planned to do so, and documentation will show that Ahmed Alghamdi and Saeed Alghamdi have documentation suggesting their travel to a Russian Republic. [9/11 Commission, 7/24/2004, pp. 233]
Al-Qaeda activities in the Balkans and former Soviet southern republic was indeed of intense interest to some elements of U.S. intelligence.  Going back to Afghanistan, bin Laden maintained ongoing ties to Ibn al-Kattab, the head of a major Chechen Islamist separatist group. An April 2001 memo was prepared for outgoing FBI Director Louis Freeh by then–assistant director Dale Watson.  The memo, “Bin Laden/Ibn Khattab Threat Reporting” warned that “significant and urgent” intelligence had been developed indicating “serious operational planning” for terrorism attacks by “Sunni extremists with links to Ibn al Khattab, an extremist leader in Chechnya, and to Usama Bin Laden.”  That memo, according to Freeh and the five top FBI counter-terrorism officials to whom it was addressed, remained unread on 9/11, was eventually uncovered in 2011.(5)  
Had that memo been more widely circulated, the FBI investigators trying to obtain a FISA warrant to open the laptop of Zakaria Moussaoui, a recruiter for Khattab, would much more likely have been granted when sought in the weeks before 9/11, the contents of which would have led to several of the key hijackers.  
That memo was not discussed in the 9-11 Commission report.  Nonetheless, other aspects of Bin Laden's activities with the Chechens received some discussion. According to page 58 of the 9-11 Committee report, UBL continued his operations (which the CIA knew were coordinated with Saudi intelligence) against the Russians and their allies.  Even after he was billeted to Afghanistan, he was still a major active player and frequent flier:
Bin Ladin’s impressive array of offices covertly provided financial and other support for terrorist activities. The network included a major business enterprise in Cyprus; a “services” branch in Zagreb; an office of the Benevolence International Foundation in Sarajevo, which supported the Bosnian Muslims in their conflict with Serbia and Croatia; ... He also made use of the already-established Third World Relief Agency (TWRA) headquartered in Vienna, whose branch office locations included Zagreb and Budapest.
Bin Ladin now had a vision of himself as head of an international jihad confederation. In Sudan, he established an “Islamic Army Shura” that was to serve as the coordinating body for the consortium of terrorist groups with which he was forging alliances.... Bin Ladin maintained connections in the Bosnian conflict... the groundwork for a true global terrorist network was being laid.
The 9-11 report also speaks of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM). On page 145 of the report it says:
No one exemplifies the model of the terrorist entrepreneur more clearly than Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the principal architect of the 9/11 attacks.
Page 148 of the Commission Report tells of the same KSM’s role in Bosnia:
In 1992, KSM spent some time fighting alongside the mujahideen in Bosnia and supporting that effort with financial donations.
Page 155 outlines how deeply KSM was involved in the planning of the 9-11 terrorist attacks, and it details that two of the hijackers (Khalid al Mihdhar, and Nawaf al Hazmi) who hijacked American Airlines Flight 77, had also fought in Bosnia, and that it was the Bosnia experience that bound this group together into the extension of Jihad to their erstwhile covert allies, the United States.  One set of dots the Commission did not connect was the fact that bin Laden and his network continued to operate freely is the fact that they were protected by Saudi and Pakistani intelligence services, and were viewed by CIA as an extension of major factions within the Saudi Royal family and Pakistani military establishment. This accounts for the ability of known al-Qaeda operatives to enter the U.S. before 9/11 while under CIA surveillance:
Bin Ladin reportedly discussed the planes operation with KSM and Atef in a series of meetings in the spring of 1999 at the al Matar complex near Kandahar. KSM’s original concept of using one of the hijacked planes to make a media statement was scrapped, but Bin Ladin considered the basic idea feasible. Bin Ladin, Atef, and KSM developed an initial list of targets. These included the White House, the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon, and the World Trade Center. According to KSM, Bin Ladin wanted to destroy the White House and the Pentagon, KSM wanted to strike the World Trade Center, and all of them wanted to hit the Capitol. No one else was involved in the initial selection of targets.
Bin Ladin also soon selected four individuals to serve as suicide operatives: Khalid al Mihdhar, Nawaf al Hazmi, Khallad, and Abu Bara al Yemeni.During the al Matar meetings, Bin Ladin told KSM that Mihdhar and Hazmi were so eager to participate in an operation against the United States that they had already obtained U.S. visas. KSM states that they had done so on their own after the suicide of their friend Azzam (Nashiri’s cousin) in carrying out the Nairobi bombing. KSM had not met them. His only guidance from Bin Ladin was that the two should eventually go to the United States for pilot training.
Hazmi and Mihdhar were Saudi nationals, born in Mecca. Like the others in this initial group of selectees, they were already experienced mujahideen. They had traveled together to fight in Bosnia in a group that journeyed to the Balkans in 1995.
*
Indeed, long after the Soviets evacuated Afghanistan, Bin Laden and his associates continued to be treated as an important asset of an allied intelligence service.  The CIA facilitated travel and training inside the U.S. for a number of Jihadist figures, including bin Laden "Services" operation, later known as al-Qaeda continued throughout the 1990s and into the 21st Century.  Persons known by U.S. intelligence to be al-Qaeda paramilitary and financiers traveled into and operating inside the U.S. with apparent impunity until 9/11, and that was during the watch of Cofer Black after he was given command of the CIA unit that dealt with bin Laden.
Bin Laden was also key to financing the Bosnian War, as well as the offensives that sprung up in Kosovo, Chechnya, and in other strategic assets that the west worked with the Saudis to strip away from the Russian sphere in the 1990s.  Author Adam Robinson notes that bin Laden took over the leading role in financing Islamist militias after BCCI collapsed in 1991.  Bin Laden had just just moved to Sudan, ruled by Hassan al-Turabi. Robinson observes, “Without a system by which money could be transferred around the world invisibly, it would be relatively simple for terrorist funds to be traced. Dealing with this crisis fell to al-Turabi. In desperation he turned to Osama.... The future of the struggle could come to rest on Osama’s shoulders.” After his arrival in Sudan, bin Laden led a small team of financial experts who developed a plan to replace the functions of BCCI. Bin Laden had previously developed contacts with many of the main Islamist backers during the Afghan war.
“During the summer of 1991 he discreetly made contact with many of the wealthiest of these individuals, especially those with an international network of companies....", Robinson recounts. "Within months, Osama unveiled before an astonished al-Turabi what he called ‘the Brotherhood Group.’” This is apparently a reference to the Muslim Brotherhood, which overlaps "The Golden Chain" that finances al-Qaeda, after a document describing that network was seized in March 2002 raid by Bosnian police authorities of the premises of the Benevolence International Foundation in Sarajevo. Robinson says this group is made up of 134 Arab businessmen with a collective wealth of many billions of dollars. The network will effectively replace BCCI for Islamist militants. [Robinson, 2001, pp. 138-139]  
While bin Laden and Black were in Sudan, that country became the center for financing and supporting the Saudi paramilitary forces abroad. The Third World Relief Agency (TWRA), the primary conduit for worldwide financing of Bosnian Serb arms imports, was based in Khartoum with an office in Vienna, was intimately interlinked with al-Qaeda's own financial ties to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.  Some $200 million flowed through TWRA accounts going to the Bosnian President and his party, much of it originating from Saudi Prince Salman Bin Abdul-Aziz, one of the co-directors of Saudi intelligence, and the leader of the Sudaairi Seven, the primary rival for power with Crown Prince (now King) Abdullah. See, http://www.nytimes.com/...
Many of the details of Saudi financing of the 9/11 attack remain redacted in the 28-page blacked-out section of the Commission Report. While some AQ-Saudi intelligence agency affiliated charities were shut down after 9/11, TWRA continues operating to this day.  
In the months leading up to bin Laden's departure, the State Department engaged in some very public diplomatic pressure to force the Sudanese to expel UBL.  In May 1996, Bin Laden leased an Ariana Air Afghanistan passenger jet, and relocated his staff and personal body guard to Kandahar ahead of the official expulsion date of May 18. Abu Zubaydeh, who had been coordinating travel and logistics for al-Qaeda in Bosnia, Kosovo and Chechnya, was instrumental in moving Bin Laden's operatives out of Sudan and into Afghanistan.  
Strangely, the U.S. Embassy in Khartoum that had been evacuated to Nairobi in February remained closed, the CIA station along with it, for many years.  The Bin Laden Issues Unit was given a new home in a warren of kiosks at headquarters on the same floor with the CIA Counter-Terrorism Center (CTC), with Black as chief of the Task Force.  The officers assigned to it were dubbed by their CIA colleagues with the unflattering label, "The Manson Family."  With bin Laden gone, there just wasn't much for U.S. officials to do in Sudan aside from to count goats and refugees from the decade-long civil war raging in the south.  But, the official reason given at the time for the U.S. evacuation from Sudan was heightened security concerns.  
Fallout: The post-9/11 Assassination Program
You can draw your own conclusions about whether Cofer Black was UBL's CIA control officer in Sudan, but it has to at least be considered as a possibility. Black would have been ideally placed in Sudan to deal with bin Laden, both in the less confrontational stage early after his arrival and later.  Black's thorough familiarity with bin Laden and his network would also explain his appointment in 1999 to head CIA counter-terrorism at a time it was reorganized to focus on Al-Qaeda.  
The story advances to the next stage when just before his 2002 CIA retirement as head of CTC, which was charged with killing or capturing bin Laden, Blackwater was given a global CIA contract to assassinate al-Qaeda figures, an assignment that may be connected to the killings of three prominent Saudis and the commander of the Pakistani Air Force reported by Richard Posner.  See, http://www.time.com/...
Possibly related, Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdul-Aziz, son of the rival Saudi intelligence chief, died at the age of 43 of a heart attack on July 22, 2002.  That death has been identified as part of a series of killings that resulted from statements reportedly made by Abu Zubaydeh after his capture in late March, 2002 in which he reportedly revealed the names of a number of prominent Saudi and Pakistani figures behind the 9/11 attack.  
One has to appreciate the political context at the time within Saudi Arabia, especially the split within the Saudi Royal family and the succession struggle that many anticipated would turn into a violent civil war in Saudi Arabia.  In November 1997, oil prices collapsed, accompanying a financial blowout in the Asian economies. Saudi Arabia experienced further severe economic crises during 1998 and early 1999, when crude oil dipped below 10 dollars a barrel, prompting a slash in spending to counter a 12-billion-dollar deficit. It was at that time that significant domestic insurgency, centered in the Wahhadist clergy, emerged that threatened the rule of the Royal family, that was itself split after King Faud's 1995 debilitating stroke.  
Bin Laden was a wild card in several decks, even after his exile. Bin Laden's paramilitaries remained loyal to him, so al-Qaeda continued to be an instrument of various intelligence agencies, and also a tool of contesting factions within the Royal Family.  The actual outcome of consolidated power by the Abdullah circle after 9/11 may or may not necessarily have been the intended outcome.  
Also, in the late 1990s, interested outside parties saw a range of political and economic opportunities in a destabilized Saudi Arabia.  So, despite many opportunities, bin Laden was never done away with, even after the 1998 East Africa Embassy bombings.  If for no other reason that U.S. and other intelligence agencies harvested such a rich load of information about each other and the Saudi opposition from monitoring UBL, he was worth far more alive.  So long as he retained his potential usefulness, there was ample reason to keep him in operation.
1999: Black Brought Back In From the Field
After the 1998 East Africa Embassy bombings, Black was brought in from the field by CIA Director George Tenet to head the CIA Counter-Terrorism Center (CIA/CTC), along with a Tenet protege Richard Blee.  They worked closely with Rob Richer, promoted in 1999 to Head of the CIA's Near East Division, who later also went over to Blackwater.
Efforts to locate, track down, and kill or capture bin Laden in Afghanistan using tribesmen, including missions led by Richer, seemed to many to be under-resourced and lacking support in Washington.  
In late December 1999, the NSA picked up a communication from Khalid al-Midhar through an AQ message center run by his father-in-law in Yemen. That communique indicated that a summit meeting of al-Qaeda figures was being convened in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia in the first two weeks of January, 2000.
The CIA/CTC had ten days to prepare surveillance, including videotape, of that meeting. According to the 9/11 Commission, both the 9/11 Planes Operation and the USS Cole attacks were planned there. According to his testimony before the 2002 Joint Intelligence Committee, CIA Director Tenet received more than one briefing at the time about that al-Qaeda planning summit.
*
January 2000: Black and Blee Let the Flt. 77 Hijackers Into the U.S., Withhold Files from FBI
In the second week of January, al-Midhar and his partner Nawaf al-Hazmi departed Kuala Lumpur in the company of Nawif "Khalad" bin-Atash, who headed bin Laden's personal security detail in Sudan.
On January 15, 2000, al-Hazmi and al-Midhar entered the US at Los Angeles, and immediately met Omar al-Bayoumi, an air attache working under civilian cover (Dallah-AVCO Air Services) out of the Saudi Consulate in LA.  Al-Bayoumi gave the pair funds from a Riggs Bank account held in the name of the wife of Saudi Ambassador Bandar bin Sultan and drove them to San Diego, installing them in a rental unit under the supervision of several figures (including an Imam at that mosque who would again emerge as a person of interest in a high-profile terrorist attack at Ft. Hood in 2009, who would then become a target of repeated Predator drone attacks).
The entry into the US of the pair, who went on to hijack AA Flt 77 that crashed into the Pentagon was noted at CTC.  A warning cable was drafted by the FBI liaison officer, but withheld at the direct order of the CTC Assn't Director, Richard Blee, Cofer Black's No. 2.
Black and Blee ran CTC and the Bin Laden unit Alec Station during the next 20 months that the Flt. 77 hijackers were allowed to run free inside the US, taking flight training and meeting frequently with other 9/11 attack cell members. During that time, the FBI I-49 National Security Unit, under the command of John O'Neill -- which was charged with monitoring AQ inside the US, and had been frustrated in its investigation of the Cole attack - was kept in the dark. O'Neill resigned from the FBI shortly before 9/11.  He was killed during the collapse of the World Trade Center, where he had taken the job as head of security. In the summer of 2001, O'Neill and I-49 officers had repeatedly clashed with Black and Blee over the CIA's refusal to turn over CIA files about the AQ cells the FBI knew from other sources were plotting attacks inside the US. FBI warrants for electronic surveillance requested by field agents were blocked by ranking officials in Washington.
What would explain these extraordinary actions by CTC commanders?  One possible explanation is "The Plan" to penetrate Al-Qaeda with double-agents.  Tenet has testified that this was part of his own 1998 initiative to "make war" on al-Qaeda following the East Africa Embassy bombings. Cofer Black tells it differently. The Plan was Black's own idea, approved by Tenet, Black claimed in a magazine interview.  See, http://www.mensjournal.com/... .  Intelligence writer and author Joe Trento has stated that he was told by a U.S. intelligence officer that al-Hazmi and al-Midhar had been treated as double-agents working for a friendly intelligence service, the Saudi General Intelligence Directorate.  On the other hand, James Risen cautions that in 1997 the CIA’s bin Laden unit Alec Station sent a memo to CIA Director George Tenet warning him that the Saudi intelligence service should be considered a “hostile service” with regard to al-Qaeda.  Alec Station Chief Michael Scheuer, who had founded the "virtual station", was replaced shortly thereafter by Richard Blee, who after 9/11 took over as Chief of Station in Afghanistan.  At the very least, the CIA-GID relationship remained as convoluted and ambivalent as the Agency's dealings with bin Laden, himself.  The Agency was, in fact, dealing with both factions within the split Saudi intelligence apparatus, while President Bush and his backers also hedged their bets. The result of all this duplicity was chaos and mass murder.      
July-August, 2001: Black and Tenet Try to Talk Bush Into Terminating the Planes Operation
By July, it was clear what the targets of the hijackers were and the time-frame they would be hit. On the 10th, Tenet, Black, and Blee got into a CIA SUV, and visited National Security Advisor Condi Rice, and had a tense meeting with her about al-Qaeda. According to Tenet, she seemed to understand the threat, but was ambivalent in her response. Finally, in mid August, Tenet boarded a CIA jet for an unscheduled meeting at the Bush ranch in Crawford, where the President had been deposited for safe-keeping since returning in late July from Genoa, Italy.  During that G-8 Conference, US agencies and civil aviation were on high alert over reported Al-Qaeda attacks, and ground-to-air missiles were installed to protect Bush from suspected al-Qaeda attack by aircraft. That alert was stood-down after Bush returned to the US.
Tenet went on to perjure himself before the 9/11 Commission, falsely claiming he had had no communication with Bush during the final 60 days before 9/11. In fact, records showed they had talked on at least a dozen occasions, including the face-to-face on either August 15 or the 23rd, the latter being the date the FBI finally got an alert and received some of the contents of the CIA file that detailed the Kuala Lumpur summit and the entry of al-Hazmi and al-Midhar 19 months earlier.
*
2002-2009, Containment and Cleanup: From CTC to Blackwater
Black resigned from the CIA in April 2002, after interrogation of Abu Zubaydeh revealed the names of leading Saudi and Pakistani figures who had bankrolled the operation, and after the apparently willful failure of Jawbreaker (or, the White House sabotage thereof), the CIA-run operation to capture bin Laden in Afghanistan the previous December.
In early 2002, after Bin Laden escaped across the unguarded Pakistani Border from Tora Bora, Erik Prince was in Afghanistan meeting with CIA Executive Director "Buzzy" Krongard, who handed Blackwater a series of contracts, including one to carry out worldwide assassinations.  The sudden emergence and growth of Blackwater, which had little previous military contracting experience, is curious and startling.  In recent statements, US Gov't officials have said that while millions were spent, the CIA-funded Blackwater hit teams did not bag any bad guys.  Or, maybe they did, and that must now be plausibly denied.  
After his departure from CIA, Krongard was, in turn, appointed a Director of the Whitewater/Xe Board last year.  It is strange that the same names keep appearing in the same places in the middle of the same "intelligence failures", and that so many of them ended up at Blackwater/Xe.  
Apparently, "willful" is the watchword for the negligent and reckless mismanagement by the White House of this element of the CIA, many of whom went on to Blackwater, and in the actions of these individuals in failing to prevent the 9/11 attacks and their failure to capture top terrorist leaders thereafter.  Perhaps, Prince has a point when he pleads that he and the others at Blackwater are being made "scapegoats" for decisions taken at a higher pay-grade.  If one views 9/11 and the intelligence disasters that followed, it's clear that there was a systemic policy failure that happened in spite of the efforts of those on the ground.  
Finally, there is Erik Prince.  The Agency always has an ongoing need for wealthy, well-connected adventurers willing and able to provide trained gunmen for off-the-books operations.  In the 1990s, that role was filled by Osama bin Laden.  During the Bush years, those shoes were tried on by Erik Prince at Blackwater Lodge and Training Center. Behind the legend of the Sheikh and the Prince, is the shadow of Cofer Black and a small clique of covert operation professionals whose job it was to carry out Presidential policy, no matter how criminal, risky or misconceived.
Always, the buck stops at the President's desk.  9/11 happened on George W. Bush's watch, and he is ultimately the one who must be held accountable. But, that does not seem to be in the cards.
In the small, dark world of black operations, everyone indeed knows each other, all too well.  It's time the American people learned more about what really happened, even if the system seems to be headed for yet another catastrophic failure of accountability.
________
(1) See, http://www.historycommons.org/... ; http://s3.amazonaws.com/... ; http://www.meforum.org/...
(2) See, http://www.mensjournal.com/...
(3) See, Rocky Mountain News, 10/19/01, http://m.rockymountainnews.com/....
(5) See, Philip Shenon, "The Terrible Missed Chance", Newsweek, Sept. 4, 2011, http://mag.newsweek.com/...